+1 for a specific one....
On 5/3/15 1:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
When using gitpubsub one can either use an existing git repository or have a
specific one just for the site.
Right now it seems to me that it would be better to have a specific repository
as
a) it avoids checking build artifacts into the source repository and
b) it’s a little cleaner than putting the site into either the asterixdb or the
hyracks repo.
Thoughts? Other opinions?
Thanks,
Till
On May 3, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, thanks!
I didn't know we could but after your mail I found humbedooh's blog post [1].
That seems to be the better way.
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available
On May 3, 2015, at 07:41, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Seeing as the project is using Git for source code, I'd suggest trying
gitpubsub instead.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
now that the code is imported, we should be able to build and deploy a site.
I’ve created a request [1] to create an SVN repository, so that we can deploy
the site via svnpubsub.
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9579
--
Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare,
and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three)
