I don't think you're going to get a lot of useful real-time discussion about things via IRC. At that point, we may as well just send status in email - which I'm not necessarily opposed to, but that does seem like a fairly significant shift in group culture.
Ceej aka Chris Hillery On May 16, 2015 11:06 PM, "Mike Carey" <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds like an interesting possibility....! > > On 5/15/15 11:01 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > >> We could what Apache Aurora did. Using IRC to do the meeting and allow >> ASF IRC bot [1] to record and send to dev@ list. >> >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/asfbot.html >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> Most of us attend a weekly "AsterixDB" meeting, either via Skype or >>> in-person. However the focus of this meeting is two fold. One part of it >>> is >>> regarding the development of AsterixDB, and the other part is about the >>> research efforts that many of us are undertaking, that may not >>> necessarily >>> be directly relevant to AsterixDB itself. >>> >>> Because of that, the minutes from these weekly meetings often contain >>> things that would be of interest to all committers and folks otherwise >>> interested in AsterixDB, but they also contain things that are unrelated. >>> So on one hand it seems natural to post the minutes to this development >>> list, I think there is still uncertainty about whether or not simply >>> doing >>> that is the right thing. >>> >>> Have other Apache projects dealt with this situation? i.e. what to do >>> when >>> meetings contain information and decisions relevant to the project, but >>> also address other non-Apache concerns? Any/all guidance and input would >>> be >>> appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> - Ian >>> >> >
