+1 On May 19, 2015 10:59 PM, "Till Westmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> To me it seems that the meetings are mostly UC related and - as the > research that's being discussed is usually implemented in and around > AsterixDB - somewhat relevant for the (hopefully larger) AsterixDB > community. > > I think that an approach could be to remove the person-specific > information from the notes and just summarize briefly the > AsterixDB-relevant topics that were discussed. > Such a summary could then be posted to this list, making everybody aware > of the topics that were discussed and thus giving an opportunity to > follow-up on the list. > > Cheers, > Till > > On 17 May 2015, at 10:28, Mike Carey wrote: > > Agreed! We don't want to dismantle our university project meetings - but >> - we also do want to share what happens in that context with the whole >> community. No decisions will be made in those meetings - the dev list will >> always be used to discuss stuff and to get consensus/decisions made - but >> they do serve a useful purpose to keep progress being made and >> accountability for those whose "day job" it is to be contributing on a >> weekly basis. This would be like if Hortonworks or Cloudera published notes >> from their internal meetings and shared them with the rest of the Hadoop >> community - so it's actually intended as added openness rather than >> closed-ness or inner circle-ness. (We could decide to just not share the >> notes, which is what probably goes on elsewhere - but we thought it might >> be nice to be all the more open.) Make sense? >> >> On 5/17/15 3:21 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> >>> The question is not, whether there is something "useful" (for whom)? >>> >>> It is generally recommended to avoid inner circles, and the like, and >>> have as much transparency as possible. That avoids that others are >>> getting the feeling to be outsiders. >>> >>> Jochen >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Chris Hillery <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think you're going to get a lot of useful real-time discussion >>>> about things via IRC. At that point, we may as well just send status in >>>> email - which I'm not necessarily opposed to, but that does seem like a >>>> fairly significant shift in group culture. >>>> >>>> Ceej >>>> aka Chris Hillery >>>> On May 16, 2015 11:06 PM, "Mike Carey" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> That sounds like an interesting possibility....! >>>>> >>>>> On 5/15/15 11:01 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We could what Apache Aurora did. Using IRC to do the meeting and allow >>>>>> ASF IRC bot [1] to record and send to dev@ list. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/asfbot.html >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> Most of us attend a weekly "AsterixDB" meeting, either via Skype or >>>>>>> in-person. However the focus of this meeting is two fold. One part >>>>>>> of it >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> regarding the development of AsterixDB, and the other part is about >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> research efforts that many of us are undertaking, that may not >>>>>>> necessarily >>>>>>> be directly relevant to AsterixDB itself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because of that, the minutes from these weekly meetings often contain >>>>>>> things that would be of interest to all committers and folks >>>>>>> otherwise >>>>>>> interested in AsterixDB, but they also contain things that are >>>>>>> unrelated. >>>>>>> So on one hand it seems natural to post the minutes to this >>>>>>> development >>>>>>> list, I think there is still uncertainty about whether or not simply >>>>>>> doing >>>>>>> that is the right thing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have other Apache projects dealt with this situation? i.e. what to do >>>>>>> when >>>>>>> meetings contain information and decisions relevant to the project, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> also address other non-Apache concerns? Any/all guidance and input >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> - Ian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>
