-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/52077/#review149897
-----------------------------------------------------------




addons/hive-bridge/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/hook/HiveHook.java (line 
628)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/52077/#comment217664>

    shouldnt the lineage process refer to the same set of column instances 
which are already part of a table reference. Why are we recreating them?


- Suma Shivaprasad


On Sept. 20, 2016, 9:07 a.m., Vimal Sharma wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/52077/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 20, 2016, 9:07 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for atlas.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ATLAS-247
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATLAS-247
> 
> 
> Repository: atlas
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> After a CTAS query, lineage relationship between source columns and 
> destination column can be captured. This information can be used to create a 
> column lineage process.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> addons/hive-bridge/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/bridge/ColumnLineageUtils.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   addons/hive-bridge/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/hook/HiveHook.java 
> a3464a0 
>   
> addons/hive-bridge/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/model/HiveDataModelGenerator.java
>  45f0bc9 
>   
> addons/hive-bridge/src/main/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/model/HiveDataTypes.java
>  e094cb6 
>   addons/hive-bridge/src/test/java/org/apache/atlas/hive/hook/HiveHookIT.java 
> a5838b4 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52077/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vimal Sharma
> 
>

Reply via email to