Peter Donald wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:09, Stephen McConnell wrote:

Have ust taken a look at the candidate and I noticed that your using
excalibur-pool-1.1.  The excalibur-pool (CVS candidate version) is 1.2
include the switch from excalibur-collections to commons-collections. I
think it would be a good idea to replace excalibur-pool-1.1 with 1.2 and
include the comons-collectons-2.1 jar file (commons colections 2.1
replaces the excalibur-collection dependency).  I would also be a good
idea to validate if the excalibur-collections jar file is referenced by
any of the other resouces and if not it can be removed.  If it is
referenced by something then we should look at migrating to
commons-collections.

Don't need to upgrade it

+1. In general, only upgrade dependent packages in micro version if it fixes a bug, simply for the reason you might otherwise introduce a new one.


- LSD



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to