On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 03:49, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> * that the package be migrated from the avalon-sandbox
> CVS to the avalon CVS as a separate project along-side
> the avalon framework
-1 as it does not belong at same level as framework.
> * the release of the avalon-lifecycle package shall be
> considered as an "optional" extension to the framework
> contracts
-1
It is the same approach that has been done before and failed and can't cleanly
produce some aspects like delayed activation, passivation, persistence,
transaction demarcation, bifuricating interception etc.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
-----------------------------------------------------------
Don't take life too seriously --
you'll never get out of it alive.
-----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
