Peter Donald:
I would like to apologize for the remarks I made below. As has been correctly pointed out to me by several of the members here, my reaction was inappropriate. Furthermore - as a member of this community I now regret making the remark as it is contradictory with the behavior that I expect from others. As such, I would like to extend this apology to the Avalon Community as well.
Steve.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:49, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Furthermore, the lifecycle package addresses a common need in both
Fortress and Merlin--alowing for a smooth migration path for users
as they upgrade their containers.
Then why not merge it into fortress? If Merlin is the successor of Fortress then that should be no problem.
BTW I was not -1'ing a release (which is impossible) but that it be considered a "optional" extension to the framework contracts. It is a hack shared by fortress and Merlin
Peter:
I'm so glad your back!
Knowing that day-to-day I have your considered remarks, insightful comments and astute observations to look forward to - it gives me a "warm and fluffy feeling" ... you know ... like pissing in a wetsuit. If only you could dedicate more of your time to the same. Heck - the whole world could be a warmer fluffier place and we would all have you to thank for it.
Cheers, Steve.
;-)
--
Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.osm.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
