On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 00:32, Leo Sutic wrote: > Number 1: By deprecated, do you mean code marked with @deprecated, > or code that isn't marked so, but no longer considered part of > Avalon proper? I'm fine with removing @deprecated tags from CLI, > if that's what you want, but I'm not fine with pulling it out > of the compatibility project again.
funny thing is it should not be in the compatability project as I -1'ed that but then again maybe some people are more equal than others. > I'll make the change and leave you in a nice, stable state. If I fuck > up the change, I will fix it. But I don't consider this - and I see > no reason to do so - as a perpetual committment to fix things in > Excalibur CLI. And theres the rub. If no one is willing to maintain it in Avalon - why is it in Avalon? -- Cheers, Peter Donald *-----------------------------------------------------* * "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, * * and proving that there is no need to do so - almost * * everyone gets busy on the proof." * * - John Kenneth Galbraith * *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
