There was formerly some amount of too many build files in Avalon, and some direction 
from above to
prune rather than upsaize to be commons-like. The implication being that Avalon was a 
single
project not many.  

Sorry Mircea...

- Paul

 --- Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mircea,
> 
> Mircea Toma wrote:
> > I would like to move a few components I published on sourceforge.net to 
> > Avalon, but I'm not sure where to put them.
> 
> We previously decided to not let any new components in that are not in 
> use in avalon container. Basic reason for this was the really-really-big 
> size of avalon. "focus on our core art", "do one thing and do it well", 
> "not a dumping ground", comments like that. We moved avalon-apps stuff 
> elsewhere or killed it off. Same with large parts of cornerstone and 
> excalibur.
> 
> That's the background "mindset". Now, Jakarta has:
> 
>       http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html
> 
> its is a bit extensive a requirement for a few new components, but what 
> I would still like to see is a bit of an explanation how adding these 
> components will benefit the avalon project as a whole (and the 
> components themselves).
> 
> -----
> 
> Here's what you'll be up against:
> 
> - these components are "avalon components" using avalon-framework.
> 
> Unfortunately, we cannot let that be a judging ground. Avalon's codebase 
> would swell to be about the size of the whole of jakarta :D
> 
> - these are quality components and they need some exposure so more 
> people can also benefit from them.
> 
> Exposure you can get with a link from 
> http://avalon.apache.org/components/ and some posts to user mailing 
> lists. Experience shows that hosting something in avalon doesn't 
> automatically mean lots of exposure. Especially because there are so 
> many components already :D
> 
> - I would like to support object (de)serialization in container X using 
> the marshaller.
> 
> Ah, that might be a neat idea! You patch the container (with docs and 
> tests) to support that feature, and if that's a change that goes 
> through, sure, we'll throw the marshaller into avalon-components.
> 
> -----
> 
> Not to want to critize you (its cool that you make your comps open 
> source and that you build them using avalon), but wanting to point out 
> why we need to be so picky.
> 
> cheers!
> 
> - Leo
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?  Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to