Did you even read the rest of the message? I'm not pushing a type 3 replacement. You could continue to write components as you wish. Please see the original message and do me the courtesy of reading it. I'm not trying to spark an argument over which way is best.
Sorry to be unclear, I'll try again. I wanted to communicate that I don't see the need for type 3 and therefore your proposal. This does not mean that I would -1 it, if I were a committer. It just means that I don't need it and haven't understood why others do :)
cheers,
Ulrich
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
