Not having an opinion about his proposal at large (yet), your counter argument is a bit bleak. Ever heard of methods ;o) ?
public class Abc { public Abc( Configuration conf, ServiceManager man ) throws Exception { configure( conf ); service( man ); } }
Would that be so much different from what you are doing now?
Of course it would. I cannot control the order in which the lifecycle stages are called, for example, or even their names.
AND, you don't have to use what he is suggesting, right?? If you like the strict cycle (like I do, still), stick with it... But if we get access to more components, i.e. components written in more neutral ways, I am +1 for that.
Curious: what does "more neutral" mean in this context?
Ulrich
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
