Jonathan Hawkes wrote:
Did you even read the rest of the message? I'm not pushing a type 3 replacement. You could continue to write components as you wish. Please see the original message and do me the courtesy of reading it. I'm not trying to spark an argument over which way is best.
Sorry to be unclear, I'll try again. I wanted to communicate that I don't see the need for type 3 and therefore your proposal. This does not mean that I would -1 it, if I were a committer. It just means that I don't need it and haven't understood why others do :)
Easy:
There are developers who simply refuse to use other people's interfaces (shocking but true), and to support folks who suffer from NIH syndrome (Not Invented Here), the constructor mechanism what was come up from.
It has everything to do with development style, and what some developers think is easy others think is a pain.
That's why I really don't care what method is used to accomplish IoC as long as it is supported.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
