> -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:21 PM > To: Avalon Developers List > Subject: Re: Duplicate LogKitLogger? > > > Carsten: > > Generally speaking I'm in favour of removing the class. Just > for reference - is this the only reference to framework?
Yes, it is. > If > we do remove the class we would need to bump the logkit > version to 2.0 as this is a change that would break backward > compatability. > Hmm, yes in theory you're right, but I really think that noone ever used these classes, so 1.3 with a visible remark would imho do it as well. Carsten > Stephen. > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Both, the LogKit and the avalon-framework/impl contain the > > LogKit2AvalonLoggerAdapter and the LogKit(Avalon)Logger. > > > > Now these classes are nearly identical, so I guess one set > of them is > > superfluous. > > > > If possible, I would suggest to remove the classes from LogKit as > > these two classes have a reference from the LogKit to the > > avalon-framework. Of course, the framework has references to the > > LogKit, so we end up with circular dependencies :( > > > > What do you think? > > > > Carsten > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > > |------------------------------------------------| > | Magic by Merlin | > | Production by Avalon | > | | > | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | > | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | > |------------------------------------------------| > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
