[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094384#comment-14094384
]
Sachin Goyal commented on AVRO-680:
-----------------------------------
Also, I tried an schema1.equals(schema2) check for non-string map-keys and it
is working well.
{code}
@Test
public void testSchemaEquality () throws Exception {
Schema s1 = (new ReflectData()).getSchema(Company2.class);
Schema s2 = (new ReflectData()).getSchema(Company2.class);
assertEquals (s1, s2);
}
{code}
Do you see a use case where isMap should return false for non-string-map-key
and isArray should return true?
> Allow for non-string keys
> -------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-680
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.7.6, 1.7.7
> Reporter: Jeremy Hanna
> Attachments: AVRO-680.patch, non_string_map_keys.zip,
> non_string_map_keys2.zip, non_string_map_keys3.zip,
> non_string_map_keys4.patch, non_string_map_keys5.patch,
> non_string_map_keys6.patch
>
>
> Based on an email thread back in April, Doug Cutting proposed a possible
> solution for having non-string keys:
> Stu Hood wrote:
> > I can understand the reasoning behind AVRO-9, but now I need to look for an
> > alternative to a 'map' that will allow me to store an association of bytes
> > keys to values.
> A map of Foo has the same binary format as an array of records, each
> with a string field and a Foo field. So an application can use an array
> schema similar to this to represent map-like structures with, e.g.,
> non-string keys.
> Perhaps we could establish standard properties that indicate that a
> given array of records should be represented in a map-like way if
> possible? E.g.,:
> {"type": "array", "isMap": true, "items": {"type":"record", ...}}
> Doug
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
