I'd like pull request on github #38 (C++) since currently it's not possible to serialize chars > 127 to json if char is signed
it a oneline patch /svante 2015-07-06 20:34 GMT+02:00 Ryan Blue <[email protected]>: > +1 for 1.8.0. > > I'd like to get the date/time support and one fix to the logical types > API. The issues are: > > * AVRO-1692: Allow multiple logical type representations for a class > * AVRO-1672: Adds date/time logical types and conversions > * AVRO-1684: Adds date/time types to Specific > > rb > > > On 07/01/2015 02:10 PM, Tom White wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 for a 1.8.0 release. What kind of timeline for the first RC are you >>> looking at? >>> >> >> In the next week or so. Hopefully we can decide anything else we'd >> like to include and get it reviewed and committed in that time. >> >> >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Zoltan Farkas >>> <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> I would like to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1667> resolved in 1.8.0 if >>>> possible. >>>> This issue prevents serializing/deserializing objects with certain >>>> schemas… >>>> >>>> —Z >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 1, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Niels Basjes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I would say go for the 1.8.0 >>>>> >>>>> Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for >>>>> this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility": >>>>> >>>>> - AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2 >>>>> ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools >>>>> compiled against hadoop2 ) >>>>> - AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8 >>>>> >>>>> On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix' >>>>> choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included): >>>>> AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user code >>>>> more readable. >>>>> >>>>> Niels Basjes >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create >>>>>> a release candidate so we can vote on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very >>>>>> few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0 >>>>>> from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor >>>>>> release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that? >>>>>> >>>>>> The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://s.apache.org/Cdt >>>>>> >>>>>> And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://s.apache.org/5ShO >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Tom >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, >>>>> >>>>> Niels Basjes >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sean >>> >> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Cloudera, Inc. >
