I have done non-binding reviews on the following, if a committer could take look:
* AVRO-1645 * AVRO-1693 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Committers - please take a look at the outstanding patch available > JIRAs for 1.7.8/1.8.0 and review and commit any that you'd like to see > in 1.8.0: > > http://s.apache.org/xXz > > Thanks! > Tom > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Thanks Niels. Comments inline. > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would say go for the 1.8.0 > >> > >> Note that there are a few issues that seem appropriate to include for > >> this one because they relate to a change in 'backwards compatibility": > >> > >> - AVRO-1586 Build against Hadoop 2 > >> ( which should also fix AVRO-1453 Release version of avro-tools > >> compiled against hadoop2 ) > >> - AVRO-1559 Drop support for Ruby 1.8 > > > > I've committed both of these now. > > > >> > >> On a personal note I would like a 'Yes, commit' / 'No, won't fix' > >> choice from you guys regarding this proposal (Patch included): > >> AVRO-1633 Add additional setXxx(Builder) method to make user code > >> more readable. > > > > I think this is a "won't fix" as it doesn't seem to produce any real > > increase in readability and could actually be confusing. > > > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > >> > >> Niels Basjes > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Tom White <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> It would be good to do another Avro release soon. I'm happy to create > >>> a release candidate so we can vote on it. > >>> > >>> What do folks think about releasing 1.7.8 vs. 1.8.0? There are very > >>> few changes in the 1.7 branch, so it might be best to release 1.8.0 > >>> from trunk. There have been enough changes to justify a new minor > >>> release I think. Are there any drawbacks to doing that? > >>> > >>> The unresolved 1.8.0 issues are here: > >>> > >>> http://s.apache.org/Cdt > >>> > >>> And the unresolved 1.7.8 issues are here: > >>> > >>> http://s.apache.org/5ShO > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Tom > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > >> > >> Niels Basjes > -- Sean