Have these files made it into a release? On Dec 13, 2017 10:18, "Niels Basjes" <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:
> Zoltan, > > Because the copyright notice now says you own it I guess the best way to > approach this is is when you put up a pull request with all those files > files having a new license header. > That way it is clear that you made the license switch. I think this should > be a separate jira to document this clearly. > > What do you guys think about this approach? > > @Nandor / Gabor: I'll put up a ticket that we should run rat much more > often (for both 1.8 and master). (i.e. no longer only in separate profile > of maven) > > Niels Basjes > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Zoltan Farkas > <zolyfar...@yahoo.com.invalid > > wrote: > > > Hi Niels, the license is a mistake made by me. > > Those files were based from my work on spf4j-avro which is currently dual > > licensed with LGPL and Apache . > > > > We should just replace the license headers with the appropriate Apache > > header. > > Let me know if you need me to do anything. > > > > Thank you > > > > --z > > > > > On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was going through the codebase and I found that several files are not > > > Apache licensed. > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/avro/tree/master/lang/java/ > > compiler/src/main/java/org/apache/avro/compiler/schema > > > > > > Some of these files do not have a copyright block (fixable), yet some > > have > > > this: > > > > > > /* > > > > > > * Copyright (c) 2001 - 2016, Zoltan Farkas All Rights Reserved. > > > * > > > * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > > * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > > > * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > > > * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > > > * > > > * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > > * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > > * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > > * GNU General Public License for more details. > > > * > > > * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > > > * License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software > > > * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA > 02111-1307, > > USA. > > > */ > > > > > > And according to https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x > > the > > > LGPL is not allowed to be included. > > > > > > How do we fix this problem? > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > > > > > > Niels Basjes > > > > > > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > > Niels Basjes >
