On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Robert Metzger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > @Luciano: So the idea is to have separate repositories for each project > contributing connectors? > I'm wondering if it makes sense to keep the code in the same repository to > have some synergies (like the release scripts, CI, documentation, a common > parent pom with rat etc.). Otherwise, it would maybe make more sense to > create a Bahir-style project for Flink, to avoid maintaining completely > disjunct codebases in the same JIRA, ML, ... > > > But we most likely would have very different release schedules with the different set of extensions, where Spark extensions will tend to follow Spark release cycles, and Flink release cycles. As for the overhead, I believe release scripts might be the one piece that would be replicated, but I can volunteer the infrastructure overhead for now. All rest, such as JIRA, ML, etc will be common. But, anyway, I don't want to make this an issue for Flink to bring up the extensions here, so if you have a strong preference on having all in the same repo, we could start with that. Thoughts ?
