Appears to be a problem :)

I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to Maven Central.
After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has completed.
However a look at the Maven Central page (
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core)
does not show 2.2.0 artifacts, and the staging repository has now vanished
from the Nexus site! Does anyone know what happened here?

Reuven

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN.
>
> It needed couple tweaks to get there though.
>
> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile:
>
>         <!--
>           Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat jar, the
> included version has to match what's on the cluster,
>           hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop dependencies at the
> required version here.
>         -->
>         <dependency>
>           <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
>           <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId>
>           <version>${hadoop.version}</version>
>           <scope>runtime</scope>
>         </dependency>
>         <dependency>
>           <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
>           <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
>           <version>${hadoop.version}</version>
>           <scope>runtime</scope>
>         </dependency>
>
> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster:
>
> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar org.apache.beam.examples.
> WordCount
> \
>      --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts
> --embeddedExecution=false --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties
> --runner=ApexRunner
>
> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path)
>
> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* instead of
> *java*
> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build environment
> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eugene,
> >
> > I ran it on both  standalone flink(non Yarn) and  Flink on HDInsight
> > Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nishu
> >
> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
> > Virus-free.
> > www.avast.com
> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines were
> running
> > on
> > > non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN?
> > >
> > > I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), and
> > validated
> > > quickstart and game examples.
> > > At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink non-YARN [I think
> if
> > > Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, combined
> > with
> > > the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], and Apex
> > on
> > > YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not validating
> Apex
> > on
> > > YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Eugene,
> > > >
> > > > No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom pipeline where
> > Kafka
> > > > topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and processing
> time
> > > > trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation i.e.
> > > > GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections.
> > > > I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark runner
> > > earlier..
> > > > Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Nishu.
> > > >
> > > > <
> > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
> > > > >
> > > > Virus-free.
> > > > www.avast.com
> > > > <
> > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
> > > > >
> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were running?
> > > > > The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and 2) mobile
> > > game
> > > > > walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Typo in previous mail.  I meant Flink runner.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Nishu
> > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with runner on
> > yarn.
> > > > > > > It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any
> > issues
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > my pipeline so far :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,Nishu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax
> > <[email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Who is validating Flink and Yarn?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles
> > > > > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
> > > > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I understand
> > the
> > > > > > >> difference
> > > > > > >> > > between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service". Which
> > is
> > > > > > >> Dataproc?
> > > > > > >> > It
> > > > > > >> > > definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone
> > > > cluster/service.
> > > > > > >> Does
> > > > > > >> > it
> > > > > > >> > > count for both?
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own non-YARN
> > > > cluster
> > > > > > >> mode. I
> > > > > > >> > would expect that the launching experience might be
> different
> > > and
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > portable container management to differ. If they are
> > identical,
> > > > > > experts
> > > > > > >> in
> > > > > > >> > those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows.
> > Conversely,
> > > > as
> > > > > > >> other
> > > > > > >> > platforms become supported, they could be added or not based
> > on
> > > > > > whether
> > > > > > >> > they are substantively different from a user experience or
> QA
> > > > point
> > > > > of
> > > > > > >> > view.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Kenn
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster
> > > > verifications.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore,
> > > partially
> > > > I
> > > > > > >> guess
> > > > > > >> > > because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped
> up
> > > to 5
> > > > > > >> workers
> > > > > > >> > > whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason
> Spark
> > > > runner
> > > > > > >> chose
> > > > > > >> > > not to split the 10GB input files into chunks.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax
> > > > > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > Done
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
> > > > > > >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks. You need to re-sign as well.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax
> > > > > > >> > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > FYI these generated files have been removed from the
> > > > source
> > > > > > >> > > > distribution.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files
> from
> > > the
> > > > > zip
> > > > > > >> file
> > > > > > >> > > > before
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> sending this email. Let me check again.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Reuven
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> The source distribution contains a couple of files
> > not
> > > > on
> > > > > > >> github
> > > > > > >> > > > (e.g.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> folders that were added on master, Python
> generated
> > > > > files).
> > > > > > >> The
> > > > > > >> > pom
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other
> than
> > > > that
> > > > > > >> > > presumably
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> the source release should just be "wget
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip
> > > > > "?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v pom.xml
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # OK?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # Expected.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .git
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .gitignore
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # These folders are probably from switching around
> > > > between
> > > > > > >> master
> > > > > > >> > > and
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> git branches.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: examples
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump:
> > jarstore
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions:
> > > gcp-core
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions:
> > > > sketching
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io:
> > > > > file-based-io-tests
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/
> > > > > > >> > maven-archetypes/examples/src/
> > > > > > >> > > ma
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> in/resources/archetype-resources:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/
> > > > > > >> maven-archetypes/examples-
> > > > > > >> > > java8/
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java:
> microbenchmarks
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # Here's the generated protos.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_job_api_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> endpoints_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> And some other sdist generated Python files.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Presumably we should just purge these files from
> the
> > > rc?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > How can I specify a dependency on the staged RC?
> > > E.g.
> > > > > I'm
> > > > > > >> > trying
> > > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > validate the quickstart per
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > https://beam.apache.org/get-
> > > started/quickstart-java/
> > > > > and
> > > > > > >> > > > specifying
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> version
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not
> > > released
> > > > > > yet.
> > > > > > >> > > Should
> > > > > > >> > > > I
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> pass
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch
> the
> > > > > version
> > > > > > >> from
> > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> staging
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > area?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik
> > > > > > >> > > > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> Its open to all, its just that there are
> binding
> > > > votes
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> > > > > non-binding
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> votes.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn
> > > Tymofieiev
> > > > <
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > I have a process question: is the vote open
> for
> > > > > > >> committers
> > > > > > >> > > only
> > > > > > >> > > > or
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> for
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> all
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > contributors?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> <[email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > I have verified the wordcount quickstart on
> > the
> > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > >> > Beam
> > > > > > >> > > > > website
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> using
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on Linux.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > The Gearpump runner is yet to have a
> > quickstart
> > > > > > listed
> > > > > > >> on
> > > > > > >> > > our
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> website.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > Adding the quickstart is already
> represented
> > by
> > > > > this
> > > > > > >> > > existing
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> issue:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/BEAM-2692
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn
> > > > > > Tymofieiev <
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of
> > > Python
> > > > > > >> > artifacts
> > > > > > >> > > in
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> [2], and
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > checked Python side of the validation
> > > checklist
> > > > > on
> > > > > > >> > Linux.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > There is one known issue in UserScore
> > example
> > > > for
> > > > > > >> > Dataflow
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> runner.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> The
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > issue has been fixed on master branch and
> > > does
> > > > > not
> > > > > > >> > > require a
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > cherry-pick
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > at
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > this point. A workaround is to pass
> > > > > > >> --save_main_session
> > > > > > >> > > > > pipeline
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > option.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > RC4 looks good to me so far.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kenneth
> > > > Knowles
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Following up on past discussions and
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > > jira/browse/BEAM-1189
> > > > > > I
> > > > > > >> > have
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> prepared a
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > spreadsheet so we can sign up for
> > > validation
> > > > > > steps
> > > > > > >> > that
> > > > > > >> > > > > must be
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> done
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > by a
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > human.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > The spreadsheet for 2.2.0 is at
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-2.2.0-release-validation
> > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > >> > > > > Everyone
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> can
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > edit,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > so
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > it is easy to sign up or add new rows.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > FYI the template is at
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> https://s.apache.org/beam-release-validation.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > After
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > this release, I will update the rows in
> > the
> > > > > > >> template
> > > > > > >> > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > match
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > whatever
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > we
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > have added to the validation for 2.2.0.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Kenn
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:08 PM,
> Reuven
> > > Lax
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Please review and vote on the release
> > > > > candidate
> > > > > > >> #4
> > > > > > >> > for
> > > > > > >> > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> version
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > 2.2.0,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > as follows:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
> > > > (please
> > > > > > >> provide
> > > > > > >> > > > > specific
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > comments)
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > The complete staging area is
> available
> > > for
> > > > > your
> > > > > > >> > > review,
> > > > > > >> > > > > which
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > includes:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * JIRA release notes [1],
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * the official Apache source
> release
> > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > >> > deployed
> > > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > dist.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [2],
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > which is signed with the key with
> > > > fingerprint
> > > > > > >> > B98B7708
> > > > > > >> > > > > [3],
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * all artifacts to be deployed to
> the
> > > > Maven
> > > > > > >> > Central
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Repository
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > [4],
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * source code tag "v2.2.0-RC4" [5],
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * website pull request listing the
> > > > release
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> > > > > publishing
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> the
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> API
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > reference manual [6].
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * Java artifacts were built with
> > Maven
> > > > > 3.5.0
> > > > > > >> and
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> OpenJDK/Oracle
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > JDK
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > 1.8.0_144.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * Python artifacts are deployed
> along
> > > > with
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > source
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> release
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> to
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > dist.apache.org [2].
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72
> > > > hours.
> > > > > It
> > > > > > >> is
> > > > > > >> > > > > adopted by
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > majority
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > affirmative
> > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Reuven
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/
> > > > > > >> > > > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > rojectId=12319527&version=12341044
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > > > > >> > > dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [3]
> > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [4] https://repository.apache.org/
> > > > > > >> > > content/repositories/
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > orgapachebeam-1025/
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/
> > > > > > >> beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC4
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > <
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC4>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [6]
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > > > > Nishu Tayal
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > > > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_
> term=icon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Virus-free.
> > > > > > www.avast.com
> > > > > > <
> > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> > > > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_
> term=link
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Nishu Tayal
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Nishu Tayal
> >
>

Reply via email to