BTW,

It's been over a day, and I still don't see 2.2.0 listed at
https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core How
long does it usually take to promote the artifacts here?

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Reuven Lax <[email protected]> wrote:

> Appears to be a problem :)
>
> I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to Maven Central.
> After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has completed.
> However a look at the Maven Central page (https://mvnrepository.com/
> artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core) does not show 2.2.0
> artifacts, and the staging repository has now vanished from the Nexus site!
> Does anyone know what happened here?
>
> Reuven
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN.
>>
>> It needed couple tweaks to get there though.
>>
>> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile:
>>
>>         <!--
>>           Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat jar, the
>> included version has to match what's on the cluster,
>>           hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop dependencies at the
>> required version here.
>>         -->
>>         <dependency>
>>           <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
>>           <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId>
>>           <version>${hadoop.version}</version>
>>           <scope>runtime</scope>
>>         </dependency>
>>         <dependency>
>>           <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
>>           <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
>>           <version>${hadoop.version}</version>
>>           <scope>runtime</scope>
>>         </dependency>
>>
>> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster:
>>
>> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar org.apache.beam.examples.WordC
>> ount
>> \
>>      --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts
>> --embeddedExecution=false --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties
>> --runner=ApexRunner
>>
>> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path)
>>
>> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* instead of
>> *java*
>> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build environment
>> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Eugene,
>> >
>> > I ran it on both  standalone flink(non Yarn) and  Flink on HDInsight
>> > Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Nishu
>> >
>> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
>> > Virus-free.
>> > www.avast.com
>> > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines were
>> running
>> > on
>> > > non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN?
>> > >
>> > > I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), and
>> > validated
>> > > quickstart and game examples.
>> > > At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink non-YARN [I
>> think if
>> > > Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, combined
>> > with
>> > > the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], and
>> Apex
>> > on
>> > > YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not validating
>> Apex
>> > on
>> > > YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time?
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Eugene,
>> > > >
>> > > > No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom pipeline where
>> > Kafka
>> > > > topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and processing
>> time
>> > > > trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation i.e.
>> > > > GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections.
>> > > > I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark runner
>> > > earlier..
>> > > > Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > Nishu.
>> > > >
>> > > > <
>> > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
>> > > > >
>> > > > Virus-free.
>> > > > www.avast.com
>> > > > <
>> > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
>> > > > >
>> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were running?
>> > > > > The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and 2)
>> mobile
>> > > game
>> > > > > walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Typo in previous mail.  I meant Flink runner.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > Nishu
>> > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with runner on
>> > yarn.
>> > > > > > > It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any
>> > issues
>> > > > > with
>> > > > > > > my pipeline so far :)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,Nishu
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax
>> > <[email protected]
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> Who is validating Flink and Yarn?
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles
>> > > > > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <
>> > > > > > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > > In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I
>> understand
>> > the
>> > > > > > >> difference
>> > > > > > >> > > between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service".
>> Which
>> > is
>> > > > > > >> Dataproc?
>> > > > > > >> > It
>> > > > > > >> > > definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone
>> > > > cluster/service.
>> > > > > > >> Does
>> > > > > > >> > it
>> > > > > > >> > > count for both?
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own non-YARN
>> > > > cluster
>> > > > > > >> mode. I
>> > > > > > >> > would expect that the launching experience might be
>> different
>> > > and
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > >> > portable container management to differ. If they are
>> > identical,
>> > > > > > experts
>> > > > > > >> in
>> > > > > > >> > those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows.
>> > Conversely,
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > >> other
>> > > > > > >> > platforms become supported, they could be added or not
>> based
>> > on
>> > > > > > whether
>> > > > > > >> > they are substantively different from a user experience or
>> QA
>> > > > point
>> > > > > of
>> > > > > > >> > view.
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > Kenn
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > > Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster
>> > > > verifications.
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore,
>> > > partially
>> > > > I
>> > > > > > >> guess
>> > > > > > >> > > because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped
>> up
>> > > to 5
>> > > > > > >> workers
>> > > > > > >> > > whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason
>> Spark
>> > > > runner
>> > > > > > >> chose
>> > > > > > >> > > not to split the 10GB input files into chunks.
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax
>> > > > > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > Done
>> > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
>> > > > > > >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks. You need to re-sign as well.
>> > > > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax
>> > > > > > >> > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > > FYI these generated files have been removed from
>> the
>> > > > source
>> > > > > > >> > > > distribution.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax <
>> > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files
>> from
>> > > the
>> > > > > zip
>> > > > > > >> file
>> > > > > > >> > > > before
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >> sending this email. Let me check again.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Reuven
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> The source distribution contains a couple of
>> files
>> > not
>> > > > on
>> > > > > > >> github
>> > > > > > >> > > > (e.g.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> folders that were added on master, Python
>> generated
>> > > > > files).
>> > > > > > >> The
>> > > > > > >> > pom
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other
>> than
>> > > > that
>> > > > > > >> > > presumably
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> the source release should just be "wget
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip
>> > > > > "?
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v
>> pom.xml
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # OK?
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # Expected.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .git
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in beam/: .gitignore
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # These folders are probably from switching
>> around
>> > > > between
>> > > > > > >> master
>> > > > > > >> > > and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> git branches.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink:
>> examples
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump:
>> > jarstore
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions:
>> > > gcp-core
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions:
>> > > > sketching
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io:
>> > > > > file-based-io-tests
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/
>> > > > > > >> > maven-archetypes/examples/src/
>> > > > > > >> > > ma
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> in/resources/archetype-resources:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/
>> > > > > > >> maven-archetypes/examples-
>> > > > > > >> > > java8/
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> src
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java:
>> microbenchmarks
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> # Here's the generated protos.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_job_api_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> endpoints_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/
>> > > > > > >> > apache_beam/portability/api:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> And some other sdist generated Python files.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Presumably we should just purge these files from
>> the
>> > > rc?
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > How can I specify a dependency on the staged
>> RC?
>> > > E.g.
>> > > > > I'm
>> > > > > > >> > trying
>> > > > > > >> > > to
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > validate the quickstart per
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > https://beam.apache.org/get-
>> > > started/quickstart-java/
>> > > > > and
>> > > > > > >> > > > specifying
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> version
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not
>> > > released
>> > > > > > yet.
>> > > > > > >> > > Should
>> > > > > > >> > > > I
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> pass
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch
>> the
>> > > > > version
>> > > > > > >> from
>> > > > > > >> > > the
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> staging
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > area?
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik
>> > > > > > >> > > > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> Its open to all, its just that there are
>> binding
>> > > > votes
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > non-binding
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> votes.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn
>> > > Tymofieiev
>> > > > <
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > I have a process question: is the vote open
>> for
>> > > > > > >> committers
>> > > > > > >> > > only
>> > > > > > >> > > > or
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> for
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> all
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > contributors?
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> <[email protected]>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > +1, Approve the release
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > I have verified the wordcount quickstart
>> on
>> > the
>> > > > > > Apache
>> > > > > > >> > Beam
>> > > > > > >> > > > > website
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> using
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on
>> Linux.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > The Gearpump runner is yet to have a
>> > quickstart
>> > > > > > listed
>> > > > > > >> on
>> > > > > > >> > > our
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> website.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > Adding the quickstart is already
>> represented
>> > by
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > >> > > existing
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> issue:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/
>> > > jira/browse/BEAM-2692
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn
>> > > > > > Tymofieiev <
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of
>> > > Python
>> > > > > > >> > artifacts
>> > > > > > >> > > in
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> [2], and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > checked Python side of the validation
>> > > checklist
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > > >> > Linux.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > There is one known issue in UserScore
>> > example
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > >> > Dataflow
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> runner.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> The
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > issue has been fixed on master branch
>> and
>> > > does
>> > > > > not
>> > > > > > >> > > require a
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > cherry-pick
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > at
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > this point. A workaround is to pass
>> > > > > > >> --save_main_session
>> > > > > > >> > > > > pipeline
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > option.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > RC4 looks good to me so far.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM,
>> Kenneth
>> > > > Knowles
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Following up on past discussions and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/
>> > > > > jira/browse/BEAM-1189
>> > > > > > I
>> > > > > > >> > have
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> prepared a
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > spreadsheet so we can sign up for
>> > > validation
>> > > > > > steps
>> > > > > > >> > that
>> > > > > > >> > > > > must be
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> done
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > by a
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > human.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > The spreadsheet for 2.2.0 is at
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > https://s.apache.org/beam-2.2.0-release-validation
>> > > > > > >> .
>> > > > > > >> > > > > Everyone
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> can
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > edit,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > so
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > it is easy to sign up or add new rows.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > FYI the template is at
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> https://s.apache.org/beam-release-validation.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > After
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > this release, I will update the rows
>> in
>> > the
>> > > > > > >> template
>> > > > > > >> > to
>> > > > > > >> > > > > match
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > whatever
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > we
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > have added to the validation for
>> 2.2.0.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Kenn
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:08 PM,
>> Reuven
>> > > Lax
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > <[email protected]
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Please review and vote on the
>> release
>> > > > > candidate
>> > > > > > >> #4
>> > > > > > >> > for
>> > > > > > >> > > > the
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> version
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > 2.2.0,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > as follows:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
>> > > > (please
>> > > > > > >> provide
>> > > > > > >> > > > > specific
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > comments)
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > The complete staging area is
>> available
>> > > for
>> > > > > your
>> > > > > > >> > > review,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > which
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > includes:
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * JIRA release notes [1],
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * the official Apache source
>> release
>> > to
>> > > > be
>> > > > > > >> > deployed
>> > > > > > >> > > to
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > dist.apache.org
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [2],
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > which is signed with the key with
>> > > > fingerprint
>> > > > > > >> > B98B7708
>> > > > > > >> > > > > [3],
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * all artifacts to be deployed to
>> the
>> > > > Maven
>> > > > > > >> > Central
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> Repository
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > [4],
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * source code tag "v2.2.0-RC4"
>> [5],
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * website pull request listing the
>> > > > release
>> > > > > > and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > publishing
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> the
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> API
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > reference manual [6].
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * Java artifacts were built with
>> > Maven
>> > > > > 3.5.0
>> > > > > > >> and
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> OpenJDK/Oracle
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > JDK
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > 1.8.0_144.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >   * Python artifacts are deployed
>> along
>> > > > with
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > >> > > source
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> release
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> to
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > the
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > dist.apache.org [2].
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > The vote will be open for at least
>> 72
>> > > > hours.
>> > > > > It
>> > > > > > >> is
>> > > > > > >> > > > > adopted by
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > majority
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> > affirmative
>> > > > > > votes.
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > Reuven
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/
>> > > > > > >> > > > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > rojectId=12319527&version=12341044
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>> > > > > > >> > > dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [3]
>> > > > > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [4] https://repository.apache.org/
>> > > > > > >> > > content/repositories/
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > orgapachebeam-1025/
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [5] https://github.com/apache/
>> > > > > > >> beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC4
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > <
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC4>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > > [6]
>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >> >
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > > > >> > > >
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > --
>> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,
>> > > > > > > Nishu Tayal
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > <
>> > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > > > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t
>> erm=icon
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > Virus-free.
>> > > > > > www.avast.com
>> > > > > > <
>> > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
>> > > > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t
>> erm=link
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Thanks & Regards,
>> > > > Nishu Tayal
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks & Regards,
>> > Nishu Tayal
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to