Getting close. A few more steps left (source release, new git tag, merging the website PR, and marking it as released in JIRA).
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Eugene Kirpichov < [email protected]> wrote: > So, is the release done now? Have both Java and Python artifacts been > uploaded? > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017, 9:05 AM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > Upload to PyPi done. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/apache-beam > > > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I can do that. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017, 11:13 PM Reuven Lax <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I am not an owner or maintainer of the PyPi package, so I'm not sure > if > > >> I'll be able to release Python artifacts. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > [email protected] > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Awesome, Thanks Reuven ! > > >> > > > >> > Regards > > >> > JB > > >> > > > >> > On 11/25/2017 07:01 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> I'll go ahead and send the RESULT email right now. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> It's not sync: promoting the artifacts takes some time (at least 30 > > >> >>> minutes). So, the artifacts will be on central after a certain > time. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> I confirm that it's OK because now the artifacts are on Central: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/beam/beam-sdk > > >> >>> s-java-core/2.2.0/ > > >> >>> > > >> >>> By the way, you are promoting the artifacts to Central but I > didn't > > >> >>> see > > >> >>> any [RESULT] e-mail on the vote thread. You have first to close > the > > >> >>> vote, > > >> >>> then promote the artifacts, announce the release, etc. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Regards > > >> >>> JB > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On 11/25/2017 12:43 AM, Reuven Lax wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Appears to be a problem :) > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to Maven > > >> >>>> Central. > > >> >>>> After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has > > >> >>>> completed. > > >> >>>> However a look at the Maven Central page ( > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core) > > >> >>>> does not show 2.2.0 artifacts, and the staging repository has now > > >> >>>> vanished > > >> >>>> from the Nexus site! Does anyone know what happened here? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> Reuven > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> +1 > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> It needed couple tweaks to get there though. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> <!-- > > >> >>>>> Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat > jar, > > >> >>>>> the > > >> >>>>> included version has to match what's on the cluster, > > >> >>>>> hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop dependencies > > at > > >> >>>>> the > > >> >>>>> required version here. > > >> >>>>> --> > > >> >>>>> <dependency> > > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> > > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId> > > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> > > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> > > >> >>>>> </dependency> > > >> >>>>> <dependency> > > >> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> > > >> >>>>> <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId> > > >> >>>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> > > >> >>>>> <scope>runtime</scope> > > >> >>>>> </dependency> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar > org.apache.beam.examples. > > >> >>>>> WordCount > > >> >>>>> \ > > >> >>>>> --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts > > >> >>>>> --embeddedExecution=false > > --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties > > >> >>>>> --runner=ApexRunner > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path) > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* > instead > > >> >>>>> of > > >> >>>>> *java* > > >> >>>>> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build > > >> >>>>> environment > > >> >>>>> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Hi Eugene, > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> I ran it on both standalone flink(non Yarn) and Flink on > > >> >>>>>> HDInsight > > >> >>>>>> Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :) > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Regards, > > >> >>>>>> Nishu > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> > > >> >>>>>> Virus-free. > > >> >>>>>> www.avast.com > > >> >>>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> > > >> >>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > > >> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines > were > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> running > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> on > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN? > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), > > and > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> validated > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> quickstart and game examples. > > >> >>>>>>> At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink non-YARN > [I > > >> >>>>>>> think > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> if > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, > > >> >>>>> combined > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> with > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], > > and > > >> >>>>>>> Apex > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not > > validating > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Apex > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> on > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time? > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Hi Eugene, > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom pipeline > > >> >>>>>>>> where > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Kafka > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and > > processing > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> time > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>> trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation > i.e. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections. > > >> >>>>>>>> I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark > > runner > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> earlier.. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > >> >>>>>>>> Nishu. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> < > > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t > > >> >>>>>>> erm=icon > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Virus-free. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> www.avast.com > > >> >>>>>>>> < > > >> >>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_t > > >> >>>>>>> erm=link > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > > >> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were > running? > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and 2) > > >> >>>>>>>>> mobile > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> game > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline? > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu < > [email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Typo in previous mail. I meant Flink runner. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Nishu > > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17, > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with runner > on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> yarn. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> issues > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> with > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> my pipeline so far :) > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,Nishu > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Who is validating Flink and Yarn? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I > understand > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> difference > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service". > Which > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Dataproc? > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster/service. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Does > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> it > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> count for both? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own > > non-YARN > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> mode. I > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> would expect that the launching experience might be > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> different > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> and > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> portable container management to differ. If they are > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> identical, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> experts > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Conversely, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> as > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> other > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms become supported, they could be added or not > > based > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> whether > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> they are substantively different from a user experience or > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> QA > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> point > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> of > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> view. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verifications. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore, > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> partially > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> guess > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> to 5 > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> workers > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Spark > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> runner > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> chose > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> not to split the 10GB input files into chunks. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. You need to re-sign as well. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI these generated files have been removed from the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> distribution. > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> the > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> zip > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> file > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> before > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending this email. Let me check again. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reuven > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The source distribution contains a couple of files > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> github > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folders that were added on master, Python > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> files). > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> The > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pom > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> that > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> presumably > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the source release should just be "wget > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> "? > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v pom.xml > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # OK? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Expected. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .git > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitignore > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # These folders are probably from switching around > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> master > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> git branches. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: examples > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jarstore > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gcp-core > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sketching > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file-based-io-tests > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples/src/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in/resources/archetype-resources: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> java8/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> microbenchmarks > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>>> # Here's the generated protos. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And some other sdist generated Python files. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably we should just purge these files from > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> rc? > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can I specify a dependency on the staged RC? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E.g. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> I'm > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> trying > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the quickstart per > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/get- > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> started/quickstart-java/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> specifying > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> yet. > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Should > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> version > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> from > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> staging > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its open to all, its just that there are > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> votes > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> and > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> non-binding > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> < > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a process question: is the vote open > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> committers > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> only > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors? > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Approve the release > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the wordcount quickstart on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> Apache > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> Beam > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> website > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on Linux. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Gearpump runner is yet to have a > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickstart > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> listed > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> our > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the quickstart is already > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> represented > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>> by > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> this > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> existing > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/BEAM-2692 > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev < > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Python > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> artifacts > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked Python side of the validation > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checklist > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> on > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Linux. > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one known issue in UserScore > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> for > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> Dataflow > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> runner. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue has been fixed on master branch and > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> not > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> require a > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this point. A workaround is to pass > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --save_main_session > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>> pipeline > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> option. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 looks good to me so far. > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kenneth > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Knowles > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >
