Historically mvn has taken 3+ days to finish syncing. Maybe some of the links are using RFC 1149 :).
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > mvnrepository doesn't matter (it will sync later), the actual Central URL > is: > > http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-core/ > > And 2.2.0 is there. > > Regards > JB > > On 11/25/2017 08:01 PM, Reuven Lax wrote: >> >> BTW, >> >> It's been over a day, and I still don't see 2.2.0 listed at >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core How >> long does it usually take to promote the artifacts here? >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Reuven Lax <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Appears to be a problem :) >>> >>> I tried publishing the latest artifact from Apache Nexus to Maven >>> Central. >>> After clicking publish, Nexus claimed that the operation has completed. >>> However a look at the Maven Central page (https://mvnrepository.com/ >>> artifact/org.apache.beam/beam-sdks-java-core) does not show 2.2.0 >>> artifacts, and the staging repository has now vanished from the Nexus >>> site! >>> Does anyone know what happened here? >>> >>> Reuven >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Run quickstart with Apex runner in embedded mode and on YARN. >>>> >>>> It needed couple tweaks to get there though. >>>> >>>> 1) Change quickstart pom.xml apex-runner profile: >>>> >>>> <!-- >>>> Apex 3.6 is built against YARN 2.6. For this fat jar, the >>>> included version has to match what's on the cluster, >>>> hence we need to repeat the Apex Hadoop dependencies at the >>>> required version here. >>>> --> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>hadoop-yarn-client</artifactId> >>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> >>>> <scope>runtime</scope> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId> >>>> <version>${hadoop.version}</version> >>>> <scope>runtime</scope> >>>> </dependency> >>>> >>>> 2) After copying the fat jar to the cluster: >>>> >>>> java -cp word-count-beam-bundled-0.1.jar org.apache.beam.examples.WordC >>>> ount >>>> \ >>>> --inputFile=file:///tmp/input.txt --output=/tmp/counts >>>> --embeddedExecution=false --configFile=beam-runners-apex.properties >>>> --runner=ApexRunner >>>> >>>> (this was on a single node cluster, hence the local file path) >>>> >>>> The quickstart instructions suggest to use *mvn exec:java* instead of >>>> *java* >>>> - it generally isn't valid to assume that mvn and a build environment >>>> exists on the edge node of a YARN cluster. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Nishu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Eugene, >>>>> >>>>> I ran it on both standalone flink(non Yarn) and Flink on HDInsight >>>>> Cluster(Yarn). Both ran successfully. :) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Nishu >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> >>>>> Virus-free. >>>>> www.avast.com >>>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> >>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Nishu. So, if I understand correctly, your pipelines were >>>> >>>> running >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>> non-YARN, but you're planning to run with YARN? >>>>>> >>>>>> I meanwhile was able to get Flink running on Dataproc (YARN), and >>>>> >>>>> validated >>>>>> >>>>>> quickstart and game examples. >>>>>> At this point we need validation for Spark and Flink non-YARN [I >>>> >>>> think if >>>>>> >>>>>> Nishu's runs were non-YARN, they'd give us enough confidence, combined >>>>> >>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>> the success of other validations of Spark and Flink runners?], and >>>> >>>> Apex >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>> YARN. However, it seems that in previous RCs we were not validating >>>> >>>> Apex >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>> YARN, only local cluster. Is it needed this time? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:28 PM Nishu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Eugene, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, I didn't try with those instead I have my custom pipeline where >>>>> >>>>> Kafka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> topic is the source. I have defined a Global Window and processing >>>> >>>> time >>>>>>> >>>>>>> trigger to read the data. Further it runs some transformation i.e. >>>>>>> GroupByKey and CoGroupByKey. on the windowed collections. >>>>>>> I was running the same pipeline on direct runner and spark runner >>>>>> >>>>>> earlier.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Today gave it a try with Flink on Yarn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>> Nishu. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >>>>>> >>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Virus-free. >>>>>>> www.avast.com >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ >>>>>> >>>>>> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Nishu! Can you clarify which pipeline you were running? >>>>>>>> The validation spreadsheet includes 1) the quickstart and 2) >>>> >>>> mobile >>>>>> >>>>>> game >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> walkthroughs. Was it one of these, or your custom pipeline? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM Nishu <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Typo in previous mail. I meant Flink runner. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Nishu >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19.17, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I build a pipeline using RC 2.2 today and ran with runner on >>>>> >>>>> yarn. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It worked seamlessly for unbounded sources. Couldn’t see any >>>>> >>>>> issues >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> my pipeline so far :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,Nishu >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 18.57, Reuven Lax >>>>> >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who is validating Flink and Yarn? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kenneth Knowles >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eugene Kirpichov < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In the verification spreadsheet, I'm not sure I >>>> >>>> understand >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> difference >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> between the "YARN" and "Standalone cluster/service". >>>> >>>> Which >>>>> >>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dataproc? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> definitely uses YARN, but it is also a standalone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cluster/service. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> count for both? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, it doesn't. A number of runners have their own non-YARN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cluster >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode. I >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> would expect that the launching experience might be >>>> >>>> different >>>>>> >>>>>> and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> portable container management to differ. If they are >>>>> >>>>> identical, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> experts >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> those systems should feel free to coalesce the rows. >>>>> >>>>> Conversely, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms become supported, they could be added or not >>>> >>>> based >>>>> >>>>> on >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> whether >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> they are substantively different from a user experience or >>>> >>>> QA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> point >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> view. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems now we're missing just Apex and Flink cluster >>>>>>> >>>>>>> verifications. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *though Spark runner took 6x longer to run UserScore, >>>>>> >>>>>> partially >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> guess >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> because it didn't do autoscaling (Dataflow runner ramped >>>> >>>> up >>>>>> >>>>>> to 5 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> workers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas Spark runner used 2 workers). For some reason >>>> >>>> Spark >>>>>>> >>>>>>> runner >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> chose >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not to split the 10GB input files into chunks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:46 PM Reuven Lax >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Robert Bradshaw < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. You need to re-sign as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Reuven Lax >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI these generated files have been removed from >>>> >>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>> source >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Reuven Lax < >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm, I thought I removed those generated files >>>> >>>> from >>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> zip >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> file >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending this email. Let me check again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reuven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Robert Bradshaw < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The source distribution contains a couple of >>>> >>>> files >>>>> >>>>> not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> github >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folders that were added on master, Python >>>> >>>> generated >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> files). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> pom >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files differed only by missing -SNAPSHOT, other >>>> >>>> than >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> presumably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the source release should just be "wget >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-2.2.0.zip >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff -rq apache-beam-2.2.0 beam/ | grep -v >>>> >>>> pom.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # OK? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: DEPENDENCIES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Expected. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .git >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitattributes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in beam/: .gitignore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # These folders are probably from switching >>>> >>>> around >>>>>>> >>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> master >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git branches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0: model >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: >>>> >>>> examples >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/flink: runner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/runners/gearpump: >>>>> >>>>> jarstore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: >>>>>> >>>>>> gcp-core >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/extensions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sketching >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> file-based-io-tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/io: hdfs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples/src/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in/resources/archetype-resources: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> maven-archetypes/examples- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> java8/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src/main/resources/archetype-resources: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/java: >>>> >>>> microbenchmarks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Here's the generated protos. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_artifact_api_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_fn_api_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_job_api_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_provision_api_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam_runner_api_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> endpoints_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2_grpc.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> apache_beam/portability/api: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard_window_fns_pb2.py >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And some other sdist generated Python files. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: .eggs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: LICENSE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: NOTICE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only in apache-beam-2.2.0/sdks/python: README.md >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Presumably we should just purge these files from >>>> >>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>> rc? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, the Python tarball looks fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Eugene Kirpichov >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How can I specify a dependency on the staged >>>> >>>> RC? >>>>>> >>>>>> E.g. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> trying >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the quickstart per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/get- >>>>>> >>>>>> started/quickstart-java/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.2.0 doesn't work I suppose because it's not >>>>>> >>>>>> released >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Should >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some command-line flag to mvn to make it fetch >>>> >>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> staging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> area? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM Lukasz Cwik >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its open to all, its just that there are >>>> >>>> binding >>>>>>> >>>>>>> votes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Valentyn >>>>>> >>>>>> Tymofieiev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a process question: is the vote open >>>> >>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> committers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributors? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Lukasz Cwik >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified the wordcount quickstart >>>> >>>> on >>>>> >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Beam >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apex, DirectRunner, Flink & Spark on >>>> >>>> Linux. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Gearpump runner is yet to have a >>>>> >>>>> quickstart >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> listed >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adding the quickstart is already >>>> >>>> represented >>>>> >>>>> by >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> existing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>>> jira/browse/BEAM-2692 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Valentyn >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tymofieiev < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have verified: SHA & MD5 signatures of >>>>>> >>>>>> Python >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checked Python side of the validation >>>>>> >>>>>> checklist >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is one known issue in UserScore >>>>> >>>>> example >>>>>>> >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dataflow >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runner. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue has been fixed on master branch
