Romain,
The gradle based release process has an open PR in
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5048 to merge to master.
I thought you were running the commands from
https://github.com/lukecwik/incubator-beam/tree/gradle

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:13 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> @Lukasz: same with gradlew and release option, pom is empty (no parent,
> no dependencies, no more description - needed since central poms use that
> for doc purposes).
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
> 2018-04-09 15:00 GMT+02:00 Reuven Lax <re...@google.com>:
>
>> Is everything needed merged into master?
>>
>> If so, why don't we try doing it with Gradle, but "fail fast" back to
>> Maven if something doesn't work. If something doesn't quite work I don't
>> think we should delay 2.5.0 while we fix it, when we can still do 2.5.0
>> with Maven.
>>
>> Reuven
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would rather have the community try doing the 2.5.0 release with
>>> Gradle and to fix the issues while people are currently focusing on the
>>> migration and not 6 weeks from now when the 2.6.0 release starts. We can
>>> always fallback to Maven if the community thinks its not ready. If we go
>>> with using Gradle, we should wait till the docs get updated so people
>>> working on the release know how to do it.
>>>
>>> Romain, use `./gradlew publishToMavenLocal -Prelease` to publish the
>>> release candidate version to Maven local.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:47 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Surely did something wrong launching: gradle [build] publishToMavenLocal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> $ cat
>>>> ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/beam/beam-sdks-java-core/2.5.0-SNAPSHOT/beam-sdks-java-core-2.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
>>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>>> <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; xsi:schemaLocation="
>>>> http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
>>>> http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"; xmlns:xsi="
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>>>>   <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
>>>>   <groupId>org.apache.beam</groupId>
>>>>   <artifactId>beam-sdks-java-core</artifactId>
>>>>   <version>2.5.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>>   <name>Apache Beam :: SDKs :: Java :: Core</name>
>>>> </project>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't seem that ready ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>
>>>> 2018-04-09 14:38 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> I will check now what's the pom status, if they are ok it can be worth
>>>>> testing gradle
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-04-09 14:36 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Reuven,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> that was on of the question. I proposed to stay with Maven for 2.5.0
>>>>>> and switch
>>>>>> to Gradle to 2.6.0 (in order for us to stabilize gradle build). But,
>>>>>> it may
>>>>>> worth to try 2.5.0 with Gradle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/09/2018 02:27 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
>>>>>> > To the folks working on Gradle last week - are we at the point
>>>>>> where we can try
>>>>>> > running this release purely using Gradle, or should we wait until
>>>>>> 2.6.0?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Reuven
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:01 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Up ?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Regards
>>>>>> >     JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On 04/06/2018 10:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> >     > Hi guys,
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th.
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we
>>>>>> should think about
>>>>>> >     2.5.0.
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > I'm volunteer to tackle this release.
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > I'm proposing the following items:
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > 1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday
>>>>>> >     > 2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe
>>>>>> time)
>>>>>> >     > 2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release.
>>>>>> Do you think we
>>>>>> >     > will be ready to try a release with Gradle ?
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > After this release, I would like a discussion about:
>>>>>> >     > 1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven)
>>>>>> >     > 2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be
>>>>>> interesting to
>>>>>> >     have
>>>>>> >     > different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's
>>>>>> another
>>>>>> >     discussion, I
>>>>>> >     > will start a thread about that.
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > Thoughts ?
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >     > Regards
>>>>>> >     > JB
>>>>>> >     >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     --
>>>>>> >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> >     jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>>>>>> >     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to