I believe JB is referring to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4060

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:16 AM Scott Wegner <sweg...@google.com> wrote:

> J.B., can you give any context on what metadata is missing? Is there a
> JIRA?
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:30 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The build was OK  yesterday but the maven-metadata is still missing.
>>
>> That's the point to  fix before being able to move forward on  the
>> release.
>>
>> I  gonna tackle this later today.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/18/2018 02:41 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote:
>> > Hi JB and all,
>> >
>> > I wanted to follow up on my previous email. The python streaming issue I
>> > mentioned is resolved and removed from the blocker list. Blocker list
>> is empty
>> > now. You can go ahead with the release branch cut when you are ready.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Ahmet
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi guys,
>> >
>> >     just to let you know that the build fully passed on my box.
>> >
>> >     I'm testing the artifacts right now.
>> >
>> >     Regards
>> >     JB
>> >
>> >     On 06/04/2018 10:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> >
>> >         Hi guys,
>> >
>> >         Apache Beam 2.4.0 has been released on March 20th.
>> >
>> >         According to our cycle of release (roughly 6 weeks), we should
>> think
>> >         about 2.5.0.
>> >
>> >         I'm volunteer to tackle this release.
>> >
>> >         I'm proposing the following items:
>> >
>> >         1. We start the Jira triage now, up to Tuesday
>> >         2. I would like to cut the release on Tuesday night (Europe
>> time)
>> >         2bis. I think it's wiser to still use Maven for this release.
>> Do you
>> >         think we
>> >         will be ready to try a release with Gradle ?
>> >
>> >         After this release, I would like a discussion about:
>> >         1. Gradle release (if we release 2.5.0 with Maven)
>> >         2. Isolate release cycle per Beam part. I think it would be
>> interesting
>> >         to have
>> >         different release cycle: SDKs, DSLs, Runners, IOs. That's
>> another
>> >         discussion, I
>> >         will start a thread about that.
>> >
>> >         Thoughts ?
>> >
>> >         Regards
>> >         JB
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>

Reply via email to