However I think it's reasonable to expect a response within 3 days, even if that response is not an actual review. For instance, the response could be "I'm extremely busy right now, and it will take another week for me to get to this."
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 10:40 AM Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 on the purpose, but I think 3 business days for proposal 1 are > over-optimistic. > As an example I saw PRs taking weeks before the review started. > IMHO, I think you should consider raising up the 3 days bar a bit. > > Best > Etienne > > Le mardi 05 juin 2018 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Pilloud a écrit : > > The one thing that seems a little odd to me is using business days. The > beam community spans across company and country boundaries, which makes > business days a slightly ambiguous concept. Not everyone's holidays and > weekends line up. I also agree with Alan, we need to build in time to > disconnect. If this is opt-in, it might make sense to collect working hours > and make it easy to opt out if you aren't going to be available for an > extended period. Until recently we had a page listing committer companies > and time zones. Bringing that back would be a good option. > > Andrew > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 2:29 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <bat...@google.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Ken for pointing out that vote is a two step process. I will write > an extended written doc about pros and cons of the SLO and any related > topics. In the meantime, feel free to use this thread to express any > suggestions and concerns. > > Thanks, Huygaa > >
