Neat! Thanks! (No guesswork! Just look at the calendar! :D)

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:47 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote:

> I quickly put together https://s.apache.org/beam-release-calendar. I
> started from the day that the 2.5.0 release branch was created.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:10 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> If our release process is taking longer then 6 weeks, we should probably
>> start the next release since we expect that it will take a long time as
>> well even though the prior one is not yet finished. This will help get to
>> an average of one release every 6 weeks.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:52 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the idea was to include a 6 weeks worth of change diff in
>>> subsequent releases. So cutting the 2.6.0 release branch 6 weeks from the
>>> date 2.5.0 branch was cut sounds proper to me. I think we should
>>> consistently cut release branches every six weeks even though some of the
>>> releases might take longer than expected (hopefully not six weeks :)).
>>>
>>> - Cham
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:54 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I recall from the 2.4 discussion, the 2.5 branch should have been
>>>> cut in late April. It was cut ~5 weeks late. Keeping to the 6 week release
>>>> cadence, we are already late cutting the 2.6 release branch, which should
>>>> be cut immediately. Then 2.7 should be cut in mid July.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:32 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Specifically, I mean that since we cut release-2.5.0 branch on Jun 6
>>>>> we would cut release-2.6.0 on July 18.
>>>>>
>>>>> This time around, we should cut first, cherry-pick second.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 12:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It makes sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I will start the 2.6.0 process on July 17.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25/06/2018 20:47, Alan Myrvold wrote:
>>>>>> > It would be a more predictable cadence to have a consistent timing
>>>>>> > between when the release branches are cut, and not when the release
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> > published.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > If 2.5.0 was cut on June 5, then 2.6.0 could be cut July 17?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:57 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com
>>>>>> > <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com
>>>>>> >     <mailto:al...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         JB, thank you for making this release happen.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         I noticed that python artifacts are not deployed to pypi
>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>> >         Would you like me to do that?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         Thank you,
>>>>>> >         Ahmet
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Rafael Fernandez
>>>>>> >         <rfern...@google.com <mailto:rfern...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             Great news! Thanks so much to our Release Manager and
>>>>>> >             everybody who helped iron out the wrinkles!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             If you haven't seen it already, look for the thread
>>>>>> >             "[PROPOSAL] Add a blog post for Beam release 2.5.0
>>>>>> >             ​" [1]​
>>>>>> >             in dev@  - Alexey Romanenko has put together a very
>>>>>> nice
>>>>>> >             summary of all the good stuff in 2.5.0.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             [1]
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ae3284ca051b800b3edd73ad0f7f62344e26d3957b46794149bf1fb2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             "
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> >             <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 I meant August (not July) for next release cycle.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 Regards
>>>>>> >                 JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 On 23/06/2018 05:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> >                 > Hi all,
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously
>>>>>> >                 approved this release.
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > There are 12 approving votes, 5 of which are
>>>>>> binding:
>>>>>> >                 > * Ahmet Altay
>>>>>> >                 > * Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> >                 > * Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>> >                 > * Reuven Lax
>>>>>> >                 > * Robert Bradshaw
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > There are no disapproving votes.
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > I'm finalizing the release.
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > Thanks everyone!
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > The 2.6.0 release process is expected to begin in
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>> >                 weeks. So we should
>>>>>> >                 > start the Jira triage on Saturday, 4th July and I
>>>>>> >                 would like to start
>>>>>> >                 > the release process on Tuesday 7th.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     My understanding was that there will be a release every 6
>>>>>> weeks. It
>>>>>> >     seems like with this plan (to start release process on August
>>>>>> 7),
>>>>>> >     the understanding is that we will have 6 weeks between a
>>>>>> release is
>>>>>> >     out and the start of the next release process. My take is, we
>>>>>> need
>>>>>> >     to have a user centric view and a make promise to release every
>>>>>> X
>>>>>> >     weeks. If X=6 is not sustainable we can discuss. However,
>>>>>> having X
>>>>>> >     weeks in between a release cut and release start will result in
>>>>>> >     unpredictable release dates.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     What do you think?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > Regards
>>>>>> >                 > JB
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >                 > On 17/06/2018 07:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>> >                 >> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> Please review and vote on the release candidate
>>>>>> #2
>>>>>> >                 for the version
>>>>>> >                 >> 2.5.0, as follows:
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> >                 >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
>>>>>> provide
>>>>>> >                 specific comments)
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> NB: this is the first release using Gradle, so
>>>>>> don't
>>>>>> >                 be too harsh ;) A
>>>>>> >                 >> PR about the release guide will follow thanks to
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> >                 release.
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> The complete staging area is available for your
>>>>>> >                 review, which includes:
>>>>>> >                 >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> >                 >> * the official Apache source release to be
>>>>>> deployed
>>>>>> >                 to dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>>>> >                 >> [2], which is signed with the key with
>>>>>> fingerprint
>>>>>> >                 C8282E76 [3],
>>>>>> >                 >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
>>>>>> Central
>>>>>> >                 Repository [4],
>>>>>> >                 >> * source code tag "v2.5.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>>> >                 >> * website pull request listing the release and
>>>>>> >                 publishing the API
>>>>>> >                 >> reference manual [6].
>>>>>> >                 >> * Java artifacts were built with Gradle 4.7
>>>>>> (wrapper)
>>>>>> >                 and OpenJDK/Oracle
>>>>>> >                 >> JDK 1.8.0_172 (Oracle Corporation 25.172-b11).
>>>>>> >                 >> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the
>>>>>> source
>>>>>> >                 release to the
>>>>>> >                 >> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> >                 adopted by majority
>>>>>> >                 >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> Thanks,
>>>>>> >                 >> JB
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >> [1]
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12342847
>>>>>> >                 >> [2]
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.5.0/
>>>>>> >                 >> [3]
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> >                 >> [4]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1043/
>>>>>> >                 >> [5]
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.5.0-RC2
>>>>>> >                 >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/463
>>>>>> >                 >>
>>>>>> >                 >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 --
>>>>>> >                 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> >                 jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>>>>>> >                 http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> >                 Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to