On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:

> JB, thank you for making this release happen.
>
> I noticed that python artifacts are not deployed to pypi yet. Would you
> like me to do that?
>
> Thank you,
> Ahmet
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Rafael Fernandez <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Great news! Thanks so much to our Release Manager and everybody who
>> helped iron out the wrinkles!
>>
>> If you haven't seen it already, look for the thread "[PROPOSAL] Add a
>> blog post for Beam release 2.5.0
>> ​" [1]​
>> in dev@  - Alexey Romanenko has put together a very nice summary of all
>> the good stuff in 2.5.0.
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ae3284ca051b800b3ed
>> d73ad0f7f62344e26d3957b46794149bf1fb2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>
>> "
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:33 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I meant August (not July) for next release cycle.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 23/06/2018 05:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release.
>>> >
>>> > There are 12 approving votes, 5 of which are binding:
>>> > * Ahmet Altay
>>> > * Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> > * Lukasz Cwik
>>> > * Reuven Lax
>>> > * Robert Bradshaw
>>> >
>>> > There are no disapproving votes.
>>> >
>>> > I'm finalizing the release.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks everyone!
>>> >
>>> > The 2.6.0 release process is expected to begin in 6 weeks. So we should
>>> > start the Jira triage on Saturday, 4th July and I would like to start
>>> > the release process on Tuesday 7th.
>>>
>>
My understanding was that there will be a release every 6 weeks. It seems
like with this plan (to start release process on August 7), the
understanding is that we will have 6 weeks between a release is out and the
start of the next release process. My take is, we need to have a user
centric view and a make promise to release every X weeks. If X=6 is not
sustainable we can discuss. However, having X weeks in between a release
cut and release start will result in unpredictable release dates.

What do you think?


> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 17/06/2018 07:18, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>> >> Hi everyone,
>>> >>
>>> >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>> >> 2.5.0, as follows:
>>> >>
>>> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> >>
>>> >> NB: this is the first release using Gradle, so don't be too harsh ;) A
>>> >> PR about the release guide will follow thanks to this release.
>>> >>
>>> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>> dist.apache.org
>>> >> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>>> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> >> * source code tag "v2.5.0-RC2" [5],
>>> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
>>> >> reference manual [6].
>>> >> * Java artifacts were built with Gradle 4.7 (wrapper) and
>>> OpenJDK/Oracle
>>> >> JDK 1.8.0_172 (Oracle Corporation 25.172-b11).
>>> >> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>> >> dist.apache.org [2].
>>> >>
>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> >> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> JB
>>> >>
>>> >> [1]
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>> ctId=12319527&version=12342847
>>> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.5.0/
>>> >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> >> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> beam-1043/
>>> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.5.0-RC2
>>> >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/463
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to