:/ That makes it a little less useful. On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM Tim Robertson <timrobertson...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Udi > > I asked the GH helpdesk and they confirmed that only people with write > access will actually be automatically chosen. > > It don't expect it should stop us using it, but we should be aware that > there are non-committers also willing to review. > > Thanks, > Tim > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Mikhail Gryzykhin <mig...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Idea looks good in general. >> >> Did you look into ways to keep this file up-to-date? For example we can >> run monthly job to see if owner was active during this period. >> >> --Mikhail >> >> Have feedback <http://go/migryz-feedback>? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:56 AM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks all! >>> I'll try to get the file merged today and see how it works out. >>> Please surface any issues, such as with auto-assignment, here or in JIRA. >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:12 AM Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I added myself as a reviewer for some modules. >>>> >>>> Etienne >>>> >>>> Le lundi 09 juillet 2018 à 17:06 -0700, Udi Meiri a écrit : >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I'm proposing to add auto-reviewer-assignment using Github's CODEOWNERS >>>> mechanism. >>>> Initial version is here: *https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5909/files >>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5909/files>* >>>> >>>> I need help from the community in determining owners for each component. >>>> Feel free to directly edit the PR (if you have permission) or add a >>>> comment. >>>> >>>> >>>> Background >>>> The idea is to: >>>> 1. Document good review candidates for each component. >>>> 2. Help choose reviewers using the auto-assignment mechanism. The >>>> suggestion is in no way binding. >>>> >>>> >>>> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
