+1


> On 15 Sep 2018, at 00:59, Anton Kedin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:22 PM Alan Myrvold <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM Boyuan Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:15 PM Henning Rohde <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:32 PM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:31 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> There was generally positive support and good feedback[1] but it was 
>>>>>>>>> not unanimous. I wanted to bring the donation of the Dataflow worker 
>>>>>>>>> code base to Apache Beam master to a vote.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> +1: Support having the Dataflow worker code as part of Apache Beam 
>>>>>>>>> master branch
>>>>>>>>> -1: Dataflow worker code should live elsewhere
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1: 
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/89efd3bc1d30f3d43d4b361a5ee05bd52778c9dc3f43ac72354c2bd9@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>> 

Reply via email to