+1

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:20 PM David Morávek <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> On 15 Sep 2018, at 00:59, Anton Kedin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:22 PM Alan Myrvold <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM Boyuan Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:15 PM Henning Rohde <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:40 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:32 PM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:31 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There was generally positive support and good feedback[1] but it
>>>>>>>>> was not unanimous. I wanted to bring the donation of the Dataflow 
>>>>>>>>> worker
>>>>>>>>> code base to Apache Beam master to a vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1: Support having the Dataflow worker code as part of Apache Beam
>>>>>>>>> master branch
>>>>>>>>> -1: Dataflow worker code should live elsewhere
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1:
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/89efd3bc1d30f3d43d4b361a5ee05bd52778c9dc3f43ac72354c2bd9@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to