+1 On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 3:20 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On 15.09.18 20:07, Reuven Lax wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 9:40 AM Rui Wang <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > -Rui > > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 12:32 AM Robert Bradshaw > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 6:44 AM Tim <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On 15 Sep 2018, at 01:23, Yifan Zou <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:20 PM David Morávek > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> On 15 Sep 2018, at 00:59, Anton Kedin > >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:22 PM Alan Myrvold > >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:16 PM Boyuan Zhang > >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:15 PM Henning Rohde > >>> <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:40 PM Ahmet > >>> Altay <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:35 PM, > >>> Lukasz Cwik <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM > >>> Pablo Estrada <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 2:32 > >>> PM Andrew Pilloud > >>> <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at > >>> 2:31 PM Lukasz Cwik > >>> <[email protected] > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > >>> There was generally > >>> positive support and > >>> good feedback[1] but > >>> it was not unanimous. > >>> I wanted to bring the > >>> donation of the > >>> Dataflow worker code > >>> base to Apache Beam > >>> master to a vote. > >>> > >>> +1: Support having > >>> the Dataflow worker > >>> code as part of > >>> Apache Beam master > branch > >>> -1: Dataflow worker > >>> code should live > >>> elsewhere > >>> > >>> 1: > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/89efd3bc1d30f3d43d4b361a5ee05bd52778c9dc3f43ac72354c2bd9@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> >
