We can also consider releasing 2.7.0 and then follow up with 2.7.1 if the problem can be reproduced and requires a fix. Just food for thought :)
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: > My mistake, it looks like the correct beam staging repository ( > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/) > is specified in your pom file. > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:10 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: > >> Hey Romain and JB, do you have any progress on this? One thing I would >> like to point out is that 2.7.0 isn't yet pushed to Maven Central, so >> referring to it by version is not expected to work (and it looks like this >> is what is done in your repo: >> https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails). Luke indicated above >> that he doesn't see any dependency changes. Can you isolate and reproduce >> this problem so that we can develop a fix, if necessary? I would like to >> proceed with an RC2 as soon as possible. >> >> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Quick update on the spark issue: I didn't get enough time to identify it >>> clearly but managed to have a passing run of my test changing a bunch of >>> versions. >>> I suspect my code triggers some class conflicting between spark and my >>> shade leading to a serialization issue. I didn't test userClassPathFirst >>> option of spark but it can be an interesting thing to enable in beam runner. >>> However it is still very confusing to have it not running just upgrading >>> beam version and the spark error is very hard to understand. >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> >>> Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 20:17, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> Romain hinted that this was a dependency issue but when comparing the >>>> two dependency trees I don't get much of a difference: >>>> >>>> lcwik@lcwik0: ~$ diff /tmp/260 /tmp/270 >>>> < [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> --- >>>> > [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> 5c6 >>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> --- >>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> 14,18c15,19 >>>> < [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.5:compile >>>> < [INFO] | +- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>> --- >>>> > [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.8:compile >>>> > [INFO] | +- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>> >>>> Other then Beam package changes, the only other change is xz which I >>>> don't believe could be causing the issue. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks, let me take a look. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 18/09/2018 17:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 16:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi, >>>>> > >>>>> > I don't have the issue ;) >>>>> > >>>>> > As said in my vote, I tested 2.7.0 RC1 on beam-samples with Spark >>>>> > without problem. >>>>> > >>>>> > I don't reproduce Romain issue as well. >>>>> > >>>>> > @Romain can you provide some details to reproduce the issue ? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Sure, you can use this >>>>> > reproducer: https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails >>>>> > It shows that it suceeds on 2.6 and fails on 2.7. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Regards >>>>> > JB >>>>> > >>>>> > On 17/09/2018 19:17, Charles Chen wrote: >>>>> > > Luke, Maximillian, Raghu, can you please propose cherry-pick >>>>> PRs >>>>> > to the >>>>> > > release-2.7.0 for your issues and add me as a reviewer >>>>> > (@charlesccychen)? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Romain, JB: is there any way I can help with debugging the >>>>> issue >>>>> > you're >>>>> > > facing so we can unblock the release? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM Raghu Angadi < >>>>> rang...@google.com >>>>> > <mailto:rang...@google.com> >>>>> > > <mailto:rang...@google.com <mailto:rang...@google.com>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I would like propose one more cherrypick for RC2 >>>>> > > : https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6391 >>>>> > > This is a KafkaIO bug fix. Once a user hits this bug, >>>>> there is no >>>>> > > easy work around for them, especially on Dataflow. Only >>>>> work >>>>> > around >>>>> > > in Dataflow is to restart or reload the job. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The fix itself fairly safe and is tested. >>>>> > > Raghu. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Alexey Romanenko >>>>> > > <aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com >>>>> > >>>>> > <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com>>> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Perhaps it could help, but I run simple WordCount >>>>> (built with >>>>> > > Beam 2.7) on YARN/Spark (HDP Sandbox) cluster and it >>>>> > worked fine >>>>> > > for me. >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> On 14 Sep 2018, at 06:56, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> > >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Hi Charles, >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> I didn't get enough time to check deeply but it is >>>>> clearly a >>>>> > >> dependency issue and it is not in beam spark runner >>>>> > itself but >>>>> > >> in another transitive module of beam. It does not >>>>> happen in >>>>> > >> existing spark test cause none of them are in a >>>>> cluster (even >>>>> > >> just with 1 worker) but this seems to be a regression >>>>> since >>>>> > >> 2.6 works OOTB. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>> Blog >>>>> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>>>> > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>> > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>> > >> >>>>> > < >>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>> > >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Le jeu. 13 sept. 2018 à 22:15, Charles Chen >>>>> > <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>> > >> <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Romain and JB, can you please add the results of >>>>> your >>>>> > >> investigations into the errors you've seen >>>>> above? Given >>>>> > >> that the existing SparkRunner tests pass for this >>>>> RC, and >>>>> > >> that the integration test you ran is in another >>>>> repo that >>>>> > >> is not continuously tested with Beam, it is not >>>>> clear how >>>>> > >> we should move forward and whether this is a >>>>> blocking >>>>> > >> issue, unless we can find a root cause in Beam. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:08 AM Etienne Chauchot >>>>> > >> <echauc...@apache.org <mailto: >>>>> echauc...@apache.org> >>>>> > <mailto:echauc...@apache.org <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Hi all, >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> on a performance and functional regression >>>>> stand >>>>> > point >>>>> > >> I see no regression: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> I looked at nexmark graphs "output >>>>> pcollection size" >>>>> > >> and "execution time" around release cut date >>>>> on >>>>> > >> dataflow, spark, flink and direct runner in >>>>> batch and >>>>> > >> streaming modes. There seems to be no >>>>> regression. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Etienne >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Le mardi 11 septembre 2018 à 12:25 -0700, >>>>> Charles >>>>> > Chen >>>>> > >> a écrit : >>>>> > >>> The SparkRunner validation test >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > (here: >>>>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/release-guide/#run-validation-tests >>>>> ) >>>>> > >>> passes on my machine. It looks like we are >>>>> likely >>>>> > >>> missing test coverage where Romain is hitting >>>>> > issues. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ahmet Altay >>>>> > >>> <al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com> >>>>> > <mailto:al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>> Could anyone else help with looking at >>>>> these issues >>>>> > >>>> earlier? >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Romain >>>>> > Manni-Bucau >>>>> > >>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>> > >>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> Im running this main [1] through this IT >>>>> [2]. Was >>>>> > >>>>> working fine since ~1 year but 2.7.0 broke >>>>> it. >>>>> > >>>>> Didnt investigate more but can have a look >>>>> later >>>>> > >>>>> this month if it helps. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > [1] >>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/main/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/clusterserialization/Main.java >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > [2] >>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/test/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/SerializationOverClusterIT.java >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 20:54, Charles Chen >>>>> > >>>>> <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>> > <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> a écrit : >>>>> > >>>>>> Romain: can you give more details on the >>>>> failure >>>>> > >>>>>> you're encountering, i.e. how you are >>>>> performing >>>>> > >>>>>> this validation? >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:36 AM >>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>> > >>>>>> Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> weird, I didn't have it on Beam samples. >>>>> Let me >>>>> > >>>>>>> try to reproduce and I >>>>> > >>>>>>> will create the Jira. >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards >>>>> > >>>>>>> JB >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> On 11/09/2018 11:44, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>>> > -1, seems spark integration is broken >>>>> (tested >>>>> > >>>>>>> with spark 2.3.1 and 2.2.1): >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > 18/09/11 11:33:29 WARN TaskSetManager: >>>>> Lost >>>>> > >>>>>>> task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, >>>>> RMANNIBUCAU, >>>>> > >>>>>>> executor 0): >>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: >>>>> > cannot >>>>> > >>>>>>> assign instance of >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > scala.collection.immutable.List$SerializationProxy to >>>>> > >>>>>>> fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>> > <http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org> >>>>> > >>>>>>> < >>>>> http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/ >>>>> >>$apache$spark$rdd$RDD$$dependencies_ >>>>> > >>>>>>> of type scala.collection.Seq in instance >>>>> of >>>>> > >>>>>>> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD >>>>> > >>>>>>> > at >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.setObjFieldValues(ObjectStreamClass.java:2233) >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Also the issue Lukasz identified is >>>>> important >>>>> > >>>>>>> even if workarounds can be >>>>> > >>>>>>> > put in place so +1 to fix it as well if >>>>> > possible. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> > >>>>>>> > @rmannibucau < >>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>>>> > >>>>>>> | Blog >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | >>>>> Old Blog >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | >>>>> Github >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>> LinkedIn >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > < >>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 20:48, Lukasz >>>>> Cwik >>>>> > >>>>>>> <lc...@google.com <mailto: >>>>> lc...@google.com> >>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>>>> a écrit : >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > I found an issue where we are no >>>>> longer >>>>> > >>>>>>> packaging the pom.xml within >>>>> > >>>>>>> > the artifact jars at >>>>> > >>>>>>> META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId. More >>>>> details >>>>> > >>>>>>> > in >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5351. >>>>> > >>>>>>> I wouldn't >>>>> > >>>>>>> > consider this a blocker but it was >>>>> an >>>>> > easy fix >>>>> > >>>>>>> > ( >>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6358) >>>>> > >>>>>>> and users may rely on the >>>>> > >>>>>>> > pom.xml. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Should we recut the release >>>>> candidate to >>>>> > >>>>>>> include this? >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:58 AM >>>>> > >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: >>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Tested successfully on Beam >>>>> Samples. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks ! >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Regards >>>>> > >>>>>>> > JB >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 07/09/2018 23:56, Charles >>>>> Chen >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Hi everyone, >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Please review and vote on >>>>> the >>>>> > >>>>>>> release candidate #1 for the >>>>> > >>>>>>> > version >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > 2.7.0, as follows: >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the >>>>> release >>>>> > >>>>>>> (please provide specific >>>>> > >>>>>>> > comments) >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The complete staging area is >>>>> > >>>>>>> available for your review, which >>>>> > >>>>>>> > includes: >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * JIRA release notes [1], >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * the official Apache source >>>>> > release >>>>> > >>>>>>> to be deployed to >>>>> > >>>>>>> > dist.apache.org >>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2], which >>>>> is signed >>>>> > >>>>>>> with the key with >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > fingerprint >>>>> 45C60AAAD115F560 [3], >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * all artifacts to be >>>>> deployed to >>>>> > >>>>>>> the Maven Central >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Repository [4], >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * source code tag >>>>> "v2.7.0-RC1" [5], >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * website pull request >>>>> listing the >>>>> > >>>>>>> release and publishing the API >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > reference manual [6]. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Java artifacts were built >>>>> with >>>>> > >>>>>>> Gradle 4.8 and OpenJDK >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> 1.8.0_181-8u181-b13-1~deb9u1-b13. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Python artifacts are >>>>> deployed >>>>> > >>>>>>> along with the source release >>>>> > >>>>>>> > to the >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > dist.apache.org >>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2]. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The vote will be open for >>>>> at least >>>>> > >>>>>>> 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>>> > >>>>>>> > majority >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > approval, with at least 3 >>>>> PMC >>>>> > >>>>>>> affirmative votes. >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Thanks, >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Charles >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [1] >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12343654 >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [2] >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.7.0 >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [3] >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/KEYS >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [4] >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/ >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [5] >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.7.0-RC1 >>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [6] >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/549 >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> > >>>>>>> > jbono...@apache.org >>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://blog.nanthrax.net/> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://www.talend.com/> >>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>>
