That's not the same for a user though. 2.7.1 would be a patch compatible release that only fixes bugs. 2.8.0 adds new features and potentially also new issues..
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 3:16 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote: > +1 to Thomas's suggestion. Instead of 2.7.1 we can follow up with 2.8.0 > though. 2.8.0 has a release branch cut date of 10/10 according to our > release calendar. > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Connell O'Callaghan <conne...@google.com> > wrote: > >> +1 to Thomas's suggestion - if Charles or others cannot reproduce. >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:40 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> We can also consider releasing 2.7.0 and then follow up with 2.7.1 if >>> the problem can be reproduced and requires a fix. Just food for thought :) >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>>> My mistake, it looks like the correct beam staging repository ( >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/) >>>> is specified in your pom file. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:10 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Romain and JB, do you have any progress on this? One thing I >>>>> would like to point out is that 2.7.0 isn't yet pushed to Maven Central, >>>>> so >>>>> referring to it by version is not expected to work (and it looks like this >>>>> is what is done in your repo: >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails). Luke indicated >>>>> above that he doesn't see any dependency changes. Can you isolate and >>>>> reproduce this problem so that we can develop a fix, if necessary? I >>>>> would >>>>> like to proceed with an RC2 as soon as possible. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Quick update on the spark issue: I didn't get enough time to identify >>>>>> it clearly but managed to have a passing run of my test changing a bunch >>>>>> of >>>>>> versions. >>>>>> I suspect my code triggers some class conflicting between spark and >>>>>> my shade leading to a serialization issue. I didn't test >>>>>> userClassPathFirst >>>>>> option of spark but it can be an interesting thing to enable in beam >>>>>> runner. >>>>>> However it is still very confusing to have it not running just >>>>>> upgrading beam version and the spark error is very hard to understand. >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 20:17, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain hinted that this was a dependency issue but when comparing >>>>>>> the two dependency trees I don't get much of a difference: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> lcwik@lcwik0: ~$ diff /tmp/260 /tmp/270 >>>>>>> < [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> > [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> 5c6 >>>>>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> 14,18c15,19 >>>>>>> < [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.5:compile >>>>>>> < [INFO] | +- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> < [INFO] | +- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> > [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.8:compile >>>>>>> > [INFO] | +- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> > [INFO] | +- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Other then Beam package changes, the only other change is xz which I >>>>>>> don't believe could be causing the issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, let me take a look. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 18/09/2018 17:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 16:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I don't have the issue ;) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > As said in my vote, I tested 2.7.0 RC1 on beam-samples with >>>>>>>> Spark >>>>>>>> > without problem. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I don't reproduce Romain issue as well. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > @Romain can you provide some details to reproduce the issue ? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Sure, you can use this >>>>>>>> > reproducer: https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails >>>>>>>> > It shows that it suceeds on 2.6 and fails on 2.7. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Regards >>>>>>>> > JB >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On 17/09/2018 19:17, Charles Chen wrote: >>>>>>>> > > Luke, Maximillian, Raghu, can you please propose >>>>>>>> cherry-pick PRs >>>>>>>> > to the >>>>>>>> > > release-2.7.0 for your issues and add me as a reviewer >>>>>>>> > (@charlesccychen)? >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > Romain, JB: is there any way I can help with debugging the >>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>> > you're >>>>>>>> > > facing so we can unblock the release? >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM Raghu Angadi < >>>>>>>> rang...@google.com >>>>>>>> > <mailto:rang...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > > <mailto:rang...@google.com <mailto:rang...@google.com>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > I would like propose one more cherrypick for RC2 >>>>>>>> > > : https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6391 >>>>>>>> > > This is a KafkaIO bug fix. Once a user hits this bug, >>>>>>>> there is no >>>>>>>> > > easy work around for them, especially on Dataflow. Only >>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>> > around >>>>>>>> > > in Dataflow is to restart or reload the job. >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > The fix itself fairly safe and is tested. >>>>>>>> > > Raghu. >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Alexey Romanenko >>>>>>>> > > <aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com>>> >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > Perhaps it could help, but I run simple WordCount >>>>>>>> (built with >>>>>>>> > > Beam 2.7) on YARN/Spark (HDP Sandbox) cluster and it >>>>>>>> > worked fine >>>>>>>> > > for me. >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >> On 14 Sep 2018, at 06:56, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> > >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Hi Charles, >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> I didn't get enough time to check deeply but it is >>>>>>>> clearly a >>>>>>>> > >> dependency issue and it is not in beam spark runner >>>>>>>> > itself but >>>>>>>> > >> in another transitive module of beam. It does not >>>>>>>> happen in >>>>>>>> > >> existing spark test cause none of them are in a >>>>>>>> cluster (even >>>>>>>> > >> just with 1 worker) but this seems to be a >>>>>>>> regression since >>>>>>>> > >> 2.6 works OOTB. >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>>>>>>> > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>>>>> > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > < >>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Le jeu. 13 sept. 2018 à 22:15, Charles Chen >>>>>>>> > <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > >> <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> >>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Romain and JB, can you please add the results >>>>>>>> of your >>>>>>>> > >> investigations into the errors you've seen >>>>>>>> above? Given >>>>>>>> > >> that the existing SparkRunner tests pass for >>>>>>>> this RC, and >>>>>>>> > >> that the integration test you ran is in >>>>>>>> another repo that >>>>>>>> > >> is not continuously tested with Beam, it is >>>>>>>> not clear how >>>>>>>> > >> we should move forward and whether this is a >>>>>>>> blocking >>>>>>>> > >> issue, unless we can find a root cause in Beam. >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:08 AM Etienne >>>>>>>> Chauchot >>>>>>>> > >> <echauc...@apache.org <mailto: >>>>>>>> echauc...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:echauc...@apache.org <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Hi all, >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> on a performance and functional regression >>>>>>>> stand >>>>>>>> > point >>>>>>>> > >> I see no regression: >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> I looked at nexmark graphs "output >>>>>>>> pcollection size" >>>>>>>> > >> and "execution time" around release cut >>>>>>>> date on >>>>>>>> > >> dataflow, spark, flink and direct runner >>>>>>>> in batch and >>>>>>>> > >> streaming modes. There seems to be no >>>>>>>> regression. >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Etienne >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > >> Le mardi 11 septembre 2018 à 12:25 -0700, >>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>> > Chen >>>>>>>> > >> a écrit : >>>>>>>> > >>> The SparkRunner validation test >>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>> > (here: >>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/release-guide/#run-validation-tests >>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>> > >>> passes on my machine. It looks like we >>>>>>>> are likely >>>>>>>> > >>> missing test coverage where Romain is >>>>>>>> hitting >>>>>>>> > issues. >>>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ahmet >>>>>>>> Altay >>>>>>>> > >>> <al...@google.com <mailto: >>>>>>>> al...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>> Could anyone else help with looking at >>>>>>>> these issues >>>>>>>> > >>>> earlier? >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Romain >>>>>>>> > Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> > >>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> > >>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>> Im running this main [1] through this >>>>>>>> IT [2]. Was >>>>>>>> > >>>>> working fine since ~1 year but 2.7.0 >>>>>>>> broke it. >>>>>>>> > >>>>> Didnt investigate more but can have a >>>>>>>> look later >>>>>>>> > >>>>> this month if it helps. >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>> > [1] >>>>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/main/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/clusterserialization/Main.java >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>> > [2] >>>>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/test/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/SerializationOverClusterIT.java >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>> Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 20:54, Charles >>>>>>>> Chen >>>>>>>> > >>>>> <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> Romain: can you give more details on >>>>>>>> the failure >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> you're encountering, i.e. how you are >>>>>>>> performing >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> this validation? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:36 AM >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> weird, I didn't have it on Beam >>>>>>>> samples. Let me >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> try to reproduce and I >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> will create the Jira. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 11/09/2018 11:44, Romain >>>>>>>> Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -1, seems spark integration is >>>>>>>> broken (tested >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> with spark 2.3.1 and 2.2.1): >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > 18/09/11 11:33:29 WARN >>>>>>>> TaskSetManager: Lost >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, >>>>>>>> RMANNIBUCAU, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> executor 0): >>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: >>>>>>>> > cannot >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> assign instance of >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > scala.collection.immutable.List$SerializationProxy to >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>>>>> > <http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/ >>>>>>>> >>$apache$spark$rdd$RDD$$dependencies_ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> of type scala.collection.Seq in >>>>>>>> instance of >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > at >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.setObjFieldValues(ObjectStreamClass.java:2233) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Also the issue Lukasz identified is >>>>>>>> important >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> even if workarounds can be >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > put in place so +1 to fix it as >>>>>>>> well if >>>>>>>> > possible. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > @rmannibucau < >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> | Blog >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | >>>>>>>> Old Blog >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> >>>>>>>> | Github >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>> LinkedIn >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > < >>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 20:48, >>>>>>>> Lukasz Cwik >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <lc...@google.com <mailto: >>>>>>>> lc...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I found an issue where we are >>>>>>>> no longer >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> packaging the pom.xml within >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > the artifact jars at >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId. >>>>>>>> More details >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > in >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5351. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I wouldn't >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > consider this a blocker but it >>>>>>>> was an >>>>>>>> > easy fix >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > ( >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6358) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> and users may rely on the >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > pom.xml. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Should we recut the release >>>>>>>> candidate to >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> include this? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:58 AM >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: >>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Tested successfully on Beam >>>>>>>> Samples. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks ! >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Regards >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > JB >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 07/09/2018 23:56, >>>>>>>> Charles Chen >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Please review and vote >>>>>>>> on the >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> release candidate #1 for the >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > version >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > 2.7.0, as follows: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve >>>>>>>> the release >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> (please provide specific >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > comments) >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The complete staging >>>>>>>> area is >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> available for your review, which >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > includes: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * JIRA release notes [1], >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * the official Apache >>>>>>>> source >>>>>>>> > release >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> to be deployed to >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2], >>>>>>>> which is signed >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> with the key with >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > fingerprint >>>>>>>> 45C60AAAD115F560 [3], >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * all artifacts to be >>>>>>>> deployed to >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> the Maven Central >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Repository [4], >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * source code tag >>>>>>>> "v2.7.0-RC1" [5], >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * website pull request >>>>>>>> listing the >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> release and publishing the API >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > reference manual [6]. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Java artifacts were >>>>>>>> built with >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Gradle 4.8 and OpenJDK >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 1.8.0_181-8u181-b13-1~deb9u1-b13. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Python artifacts are >>>>>>>> deployed >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> along with the source release >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > to the >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2]. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The vote will be open >>>>>>>> for at least >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > majority >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > approval, with at least >>>>>>>> 3 PMC >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> affirmative votes. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Thanks, >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Charles >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [1] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12343654 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [2] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.7.0 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [3] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/KEYS >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [4] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [5] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.7.0-RC1 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [6] >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/549 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://blog.nanthrax.net/> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Talend - >>>>>>>> http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://www.talend.com/> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >
