+1 to Thomas's suggestion - if Charles or others cannot reproduce. On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:40 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> We can also consider releasing 2.7.0 and then follow up with 2.7.1 if the > problem can be reproduced and requires a fix. Just food for thought :) > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: > >> My mistake, it looks like the correct beam staging repository ( >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/) >> is specified in your pom file. >> >> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:10 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey Romain and JB, do you have any progress on this? One thing I would >>> like to point out is that 2.7.0 isn't yet pushed to Maven Central, so >>> referring to it by version is not expected to work (and it looks like this >>> is what is done in your repo: >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails). Luke indicated above >>> that he doesn't see any dependency changes. Can you isolate and reproduce >>> this problem so that we can develop a fix, if necessary? I would like to >>> proceed with an RC2 as soon as possible. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:37 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Quick update on the spark issue: I didn't get enough time to identify >>>> it clearly but managed to have a passing run of my test changing a bunch of >>>> versions. >>>> I suspect my code triggers some class conflicting between spark and my >>>> shade leading to a serialization issue. I didn't test userClassPathFirst >>>> option of spark but it can be an interesting thing to enable in beam >>>> runner. >>>> However it is still very confusing to have it not running just >>>> upgrading beam version and the spark error is very hard to understand. >>>> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 20:17, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Romain hinted that this was a dependency issue but when comparing the >>>>> two dependency trees I don't get much of a difference: >>>>> >>>>> lcwik@lcwik0: ~$ diff /tmp/260 /tmp/270 >>>>> < [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> --- >>>>> > [INFO] +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-spark:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-model-pipeline:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> 5c6 >>>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> --- >>>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-sdks-java-core:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> 14,18c15,19 >>>>> < [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.5:compile >>>>> < [INFO] | +- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> < [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> < [INFO] | | \- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.6.0:compile >>>>> --- >>>>> > [INFO] | | \- org.tukaani:xz:jar:1.8:compile >>>>> > [INFO] | +- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-construction-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-job-management:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> > [INFO] | +- org.apache.beam:beam-runners-core-java:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> > [INFO] | | \- >>>>> org.apache.beam:beam-model-fn-execution:jar:2.7.0:compile >>>>> >>>>> Other then Beam package changes, the only other change is xz which I >>>>> don't believe could be causing the issue. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, let me take a look. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 18/09/2018 17:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 16:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I don't have the issue ;) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > As said in my vote, I tested 2.7.0 RC1 on beam-samples with >>>>>> Spark >>>>>> > without problem. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I don't reproduce Romain issue as well. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > @Romain can you provide some details to reproduce the issue ? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Sure, you can use this >>>>>> > reproducer: https://github.com/rmannibucau/beam-2.7.0-fails >>>>>> > It shows that it suceeds on 2.6 and fails on 2.7. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Regards >>>>>> > JB >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On 17/09/2018 19:17, Charles Chen wrote: >>>>>> > > Luke, Maximillian, Raghu, can you please propose cherry-pick >>>>>> PRs >>>>>> > to the >>>>>> > > release-2.7.0 for your issues and add me as a reviewer >>>>>> > (@charlesccychen)? >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Romain, JB: is there any way I can help with debugging the >>>>>> issue >>>>>> > you're >>>>>> > > facing so we can unblock the release? >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 1:49 PM Raghu Angadi < >>>>>> rang...@google.com >>>>>> > <mailto:rang...@google.com> >>>>>> > > <mailto:rang...@google.com <mailto:rang...@google.com>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > I would like propose one more cherrypick for RC2 >>>>>> > > : https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6391 >>>>>> > > This is a KafkaIO bug fix. Once a user hits this bug, >>>>>> there is no >>>>>> > > easy work around for them, especially on Dataflow. Only >>>>>> work >>>>>> > around >>>>>> > > in Dataflow is to restart or reload the job. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > The fix itself fairly safe and is tested. >>>>>> > > Raghu. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:52 AM Alexey Romanenko >>>>>> > > <aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com> >>>>>> > <mailto:aromanenko....@gmail.com <mailto: >>>>>> aromanenko....@gmail.com>>> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Perhaps it could help, but I run simple WordCount >>>>>> (built with >>>>>> > > Beam 2.7) on YARN/Spark (HDP Sandbox) cluster and it >>>>>> > worked fine >>>>>> > > for me. >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >> On 14 Sep 2018, at 06:56, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Hi Charles, >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> I didn't get enough time to check deeply but it is >>>>>> clearly a >>>>>> > >> dependency issue and it is not in beam spark runner >>>>>> > itself but >>>>>> > >> in another transitive module of beam. It does not >>>>>> happen in >>>>>> > >> existing spark test cause none of them are in a >>>>>> cluster (even >>>>>> > >> just with 1 worker) but this seems to be a >>>>>> regression since >>>>>> > >> 2.6 works OOTB. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>> Blog >>>>>> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>>>>> > >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>>> > >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > < >>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Le jeu. 13 sept. 2018 à 22:15, Charles Chen >>>>>> > <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>>> > >> <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Romain and JB, can you please add the results of >>>>>> your >>>>>> > >> investigations into the errors you've seen >>>>>> above? Given >>>>>> > >> that the existing SparkRunner tests pass for >>>>>> this RC, and >>>>>> > >> that the integration test you ran is in another >>>>>> repo that >>>>>> > >> is not continuously tested with Beam, it is not >>>>>> clear how >>>>>> > >> we should move forward and whether this is a >>>>>> blocking >>>>>> > >> issue, unless we can find a root cause in Beam. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:08 AM Etienne Chauchot >>>>>> > >> <echauc...@apache.org <mailto: >>>>>> echauc...@apache.org> >>>>>> > <mailto:echauc...@apache.org <mailto:echauc...@apache.org>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Hi all, >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> on a performance and functional regression >>>>>> stand >>>>>> > point >>>>>> > >> I see no regression: >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> I looked at nexmark graphs "output >>>>>> pcollection size" >>>>>> > >> and "execution time" around release cut date >>>>>> on >>>>>> > >> dataflow, spark, flink and direct runner in >>>>>> batch and >>>>>> > >> streaming modes. There seems to be no >>>>>> regression. >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Etienne >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> Le mardi 11 septembre 2018 à 12:25 -0700, >>>>>> Charles >>>>>> > Chen >>>>>> > >> a écrit : >>>>>> > >>> The SparkRunner validation test >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > (here: >>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/release-guide/#run-validation-tests >>>>>> ) >>>>>> > >>> passes on my machine. It looks like we are >>>>>> likely >>>>>> > >>> missing test coverage where Romain is >>>>>> hitting >>>>>> > issues. >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ahmet Altay >>>>>> > >>> <al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com> >>>>>> > <mailto:al...@google.com <mailto:al...@google.com>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>> Could anyone else help with looking at >>>>>> these issues >>>>>> > >>>> earlier? >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Romain >>>>>> > Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > >>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> >>>>>> > >>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>> > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>> Im running this main [1] through this IT >>>>>> [2]. Was >>>>>> > >>>>> working fine since ~1 year but 2.7.0 >>>>>> broke it. >>>>>> > >>>>> Didnt investigate more but can have a >>>>>> look later >>>>>> > >>>>> this month if it helps. >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > [1] >>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/main/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/clusterserialization/Main.java >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > [2] >>>>>> https://github.com/Talend/component-runtime/blob/master/component-runtime-beam/src/it/serialization-over-cluster/src/test/java/org/talend/sdk/component/beam/it/SerializationOverClusterIT.java >>>>>> > >>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>> Le mar. 11 sept. 2018 20:54, Charles Chen >>>>>> > >>>>> <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com> >>>>>> > <mailto:c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>>> a écrit : >>>>>> > >>>>>> Romain: can you give more details on the >>>>>> failure >>>>>> > >>>>>> you're encountering, i.e. how you are >>>>>> performing >>>>>> > >>>>>> this validation? >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:36 AM >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste >>>>>> > >>>>>> Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> weird, I didn't have it on Beam >>>>>> samples. Let me >>>>>> > >>>>>>> try to reproduce and I >>>>>> > >>>>>>> will create the Jira. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>> > >>>>>>> JB >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 11/09/2018 11:44, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -1, seems spark integration is broken >>>>>> (tested >>>>>> > >>>>>>> with spark 2.3.1 and 2.2.1): >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > 18/09/11 11:33:29 WARN >>>>>> TaskSetManager: Lost >>>>>> > >>>>>>> task 0.0 in stage 0.0 (TID 0, >>>>>> RMANNIBUCAU, >>>>>> > >>>>>>> executor 0): >>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: >>>>>> > cannot >>>>>> > >>>>>>> assign instance of >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > scala.collection.immutable.List$SerializationProxy to >>>>>> > >>>>>>> fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>>> > <http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> < >>>>>> http://fieldorg.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.org >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > <http://org.apache.spark.rdd.rdd.org/ >>>>>> >>$apache$spark$rdd$RDD$$dependencies_ >>>>>> > >>>>>>> of type scala.collection.Seq in >>>>>> instance of >>>>>> > >>>>>>> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > at >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> java.io.ObjectStreamClass$FieldReflector.setObjFieldValues(ObjectStreamClass.java:2233) >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Also the issue Lukasz identified is >>>>>> important >>>>>> > >>>>>>> even if workarounds can be >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > put in place so +1 to fix it as well >>>>>> if >>>>>> > possible. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > @rmannibucau < >>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> | Blog >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | >>>>>> Old Blog >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | >>>>>> Github >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>> LinkedIn >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > < >>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 20:48, Lukasz >>>>>> Cwik >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <lc...@google.com <mailto: >>>>>> lc...@google.com> >>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:lc...@google.com >>>>>> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I found an issue where we are no >>>>>> longer >>>>>> > >>>>>>> packaging the pom.xml within >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > the artifact jars at >>>>>> > >>>>>>> META-INF/maven/groupId/artifactId. More >>>>>> details >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > in >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5351. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I wouldn't >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > consider this a blocker but it >>>>>> was an >>>>>> > easy fix >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > ( >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6358) >>>>>> > >>>>>>> and users may rely on the >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > pom.xml. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Should we recut the release >>>>>> candidate to >>>>>> > >>>>>>> include this? >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:58 AM >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto: >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net >>>>>> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Tested successfully on Beam >>>>>> Samples. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks ! >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Regards >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > JB >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 07/09/2018 23:56, Charles >>>>>> Chen >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Hi everyone, >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Please review and vote on >>>>>> the >>>>>> > >>>>>>> release candidate #1 for the >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > version >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > 2.7.0, as follows: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the >>>>>> release >>>>>> > >>>>>>> (please provide specific >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > comments) >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The complete staging area >>>>>> is >>>>>> > >>>>>>> available for your review, which >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > includes: >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * JIRA release notes [1], >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * the official Apache >>>>>> source >>>>>> > release >>>>>> > >>>>>>> to be deployed to >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > dist.apache.org >>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2], which >>>>>> is signed >>>>>> > >>>>>>> with the key with >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > fingerprint >>>>>> 45C60AAAD115F560 [3], >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * all artifacts to be >>>>>> deployed to >>>>>> > >>>>>>> the Maven Central >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Repository [4], >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * source code tag >>>>>> "v2.7.0-RC1" [5], >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * website pull request >>>>>> listing the >>>>>> > >>>>>>> release and publishing the API >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > reference manual [6]. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Java artifacts were >>>>>> built with >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Gradle 4.8 and OpenJDK >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> 1.8.0_181-8u181-b13-1~deb9u1-b13. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > * Python artifacts are >>>>>> deployed >>>>>> > >>>>>>> along with the source release >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > to the >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > dist.apache.org >>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/> >>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://dist.apache.org/>> [2]. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > The vote will be open for >>>>>> at least >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 72 hours. It is adopted by >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > majority >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > approval, with at least 3 >>>>>> PMC >>>>>> > >>>>>>> affirmative votes. >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Thanks, >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > Charles >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [1] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12343654 >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [2] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.7.0 >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [3] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [4] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1046/ >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [5] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.7.0-RC1 >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [6] >>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/549 >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <mailto:jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> > <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://blog.nanthrax.net/> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Talend - >>>>>> http://www.talend.com >>>>>> > >>>>>>> <http://www.talend.com/> >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> >>>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>>
