Upon further inspection, I don't think this would be as simple as creating
a StackExchange filter subscribed to user@; the emails sent include an
unsubscribe link, which anyone could click and break the subscription.

[1] https://stackexchange.com/filters/new

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 6:45 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:

> It should be valuable to get a digest of SO questions on user@ (and dev@)
> but I think this should be one-way, i.e. respective questions should be
> answered on SO.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:57 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +user@
>>
>> I think we'd better ask user@ before we subscribe the list to a regular
>> automated email. Daily might be OK for dev@ but I would guess that user@
>> might prefer less frequent. It will have a predictable subject so it should
>> be easy to filter if someone is not interested.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:53 PM Ankur Goenka <goe...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for the daily/weekly digest to user@
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:52 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Great idea! I'd prefer a daily/weekly digest if possible.
>>>>
>>>> On 05.11.18 19:44, Tim Robertson wrote:
>>>> > Thanks for raising this Anton
>>>> >
>>>> >       It would be very easy to forward new SO questions to the user@
>>>> >     list, or a new list if we're worried about the noise.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > +1 (preference on user@ until there are too many)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:18 PM Scott Wegner <sc...@apache.org
>>>> > <mailto:sc...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     I like the idea of working to improve the our presence on Q&A
>>>> sites
>>>> >     like StackOverflow. SO is a great resource and much more
>>>> >     discoverable / searchable than a mail archive.
>>>> >
>>>> >     One idea on how to improve our presence: StackOverflow supports
>>>> >     setting up email subscriptions [1] for particular tags. It would
>>>> be
>>>> >     very easy to forward new SO questions to the user@ list, or a new
>>>> >     list if we're worried about the noise.
>>>> >
>>>> >     [1] https://stackexchange.com/filters/new
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>> >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         That's "classic" in the Apache projects. And yes, most of the
>>>> >         time, we
>>>> >         periodically send or ask the dev to check the questions on
>>>> other
>>>> >         channels like stackoverflow.
>>>> >
>>>> >         It makes sense to send a reminder or a list of open questions
>>>> on the
>>>> >         user mailing list (users can help each other too).
>>>> >
>>>> >         Regards
>>>> >         JB
>>>> >
>>>> >         On 05/11/2018 18:25, Anton Kedin wrote:
>>>> >          > Hi dev@,
>>>> >          >
>>>> >          > I was looking at stackoverflow questions tagged with
>>>> >         `apache-beam` [1]
>>>> >          > and wanted to ask your opinion. It feels like it's easier
>>>> for
>>>> >         some users
>>>> >          > to ask questions on stackoverflow than on user@. Overall
>>>> >         frequency
>>>> >          > between the two channels seems comparable but a lot of
>>>> >         stackoverflow
>>>> >          > questions are not answered while questions on user@ get
>>>> some
>>>> >         attention
>>>> >          > most of the time. Would it make sense to increase dev@
>>>> >         visibility into
>>>> >          > stackoverflow, e.g. by sending periodic digest or some
>>>> other way?
>>>> >          >
>>>> >          > [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/apache-beam
>>>> >          >
>>>> >          > Regards,
>>>> >          > Anton
>>>> >
>>>> >         --
>>>> >         Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> >         jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>>>> >         http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> >         Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     --
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback
>>>> >     <https://tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to