+1

On 15.05.19 13:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
+1 for removing the code given the current state of things.

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:32 AM Ruoyun Huang <ruo...@google.com> wrote:

+1

From: Daniel Oliveira <danolive...@google.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:19 PM
To: dev

Hello everyone,

I'm calling for a vote on removing the deprecated Java Reference Runner code. 
The PR for the change has already been tested and reviewed: 
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8380

[ ] +1, Approve merging the removal PR in it's current state
[ ] -1, Veto the removal PR (please provide specific comments)

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Since this a vote on 
code-modification, it is adopted if there are at least 3 PMC affirmative votes 
and no vetoes.

For those who would like context on why the Java Reference Runner is being 
deprecated, the discussions took place in the following email threads:

(8 Feb. 2019) Thoughts on a reference runner to invest in? - Decision to 
deprecate the Java Reference Runner and use the Python FnApiRunner for those 
use cases instead.
(14 Mar. 2019) Python PVR Reference post-commit tests failing - Removal of 
Reference Runner Post-Commits from Jenkins, and discussion on removal of code.
(25 Apr. 2019) Removing Java Reference Runner code - Discussion thread before 
this formal vote.



--
================
Ruoyun  Huang

Reply via email to