+1
On 15.05.19 13:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
+1 for removing the code given the current state of things.
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:32 AM Ruoyun Huang <ruo...@google.com> wrote:
+1
From: Daniel Oliveira <danolive...@google.com>
Date: Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:19 PM
To: dev
Hello everyone,
I'm calling for a vote on removing the deprecated Java Reference Runner code.
The PR for the change has already been tested and reviewed:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8380
[ ] +1, Approve merging the removal PR in it's current state
[ ] -1, Veto the removal PR (please provide specific comments)
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Since this a vote on
code-modification, it is adopted if there are at least 3 PMC affirmative votes
and no vetoes.
For those who would like context on why the Java Reference Runner is being
deprecated, the discussions took place in the following email threads:
(8 Feb. 2019) Thoughts on a reference runner to invest in? - Decision to
deprecate the Java Reference Runner and use the Python FnApiRunner for those
use cases instead.
(14 Mar. 2019) Python PVR Reference post-commit tests failing - Removal of
Reference Runner Post-Commits from Jenkins, and discussion on removal of code.
(25 Apr. 2019) Removing Java Reference Runner code - Discussion thread before
this formal vote.
--
================
Ruoyun Huang
