Sorry, I missed the comment for not including weekend's to 72 hours voting period.
I meant to update the blog post https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8667/files once we have finalized the RC so that it can be consistent. Please add any comments to PR and I can incorporate them. As we did not go for 3rd RC and https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8714 was not blocking the 2.13 release, I went with the release. I have released the maven artifacts for beam. So I suppose, we can not do another RC for 2.13.0. If we need anything urgently in 2.13 then we can do a bug fix release 2.13.1. On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:59 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: > This seems a rushed and things fall through the cracks. > > Max had requested to not include the weekend into the voting period. > > Valentyn: I had the same question on the first RC. The PR should be > included into the vote for review. You can find it here: > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8667/files > > I had requested to include following backport PR before the RC: > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8714 - It's not blocking but would > be nice if someone can merge it for any future release from this branch. > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:59 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> The summary is not correct. Binding votes (in order): >> >> Ahmet Altay >> Robert Bradshaw >> Maximilian Michels >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> Lukasz Cwik >> >> A total of 5 binding votes. >> >> On 04.06.19 02:37, Ankur Goenka wrote: >> > +1 >> > Thanks for validating the release and voting. >> > With 0(-1), 6(+1) and 3(+1 binding) votes, I am concluding the voting >> > process. >> > I am going ahead with the release and will keep the community posted >> > with the updates. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Andrew Pilloud <apill...@google.com >> > <mailto:apill...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > +1 Reviewed the Nexmark java and SQL perfkit graphs, no obvious >> > regressions over the previous release. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:15 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com >> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for the clarification. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:40 AM Ankur Goenka <goe...@google.com >> > <mailto:goe...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Yes, i meant i will close the voting at 5pm and start the >> > release process. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 10:59 AM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com >> > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Ankur, did you mean to say your going to close the vote >> > today at 5pm? (and then complete the release afterwards) >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:54 AM Ankur Goenka >> > <goe...@google.com <mailto:goe...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for validating and voting. >> > >> > We have 4 binding votes. >> > I will complete the release today 5PM. Please raise >> > any concerns before that. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Ankur >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:36 AM Lukasz Cwik >> > <lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Since the gearpump issue has been ongoing since >> > 2.10, I can't consider it a blocker for this >> > release and am voting +1. >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:13 AM Jean-Baptiste >> > Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net >> > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Quickly tested on beam-samples. >> > >> > Regards >> > JB >> > >> > On 31/05/2019 04:52, Ankur Goenka wrote: >> > > Hi everyone, >> > > >> > > Please review and vote on the release >> > candidate #2 for the version >> > > 2.13.0, as follows: >> > > >> > > [ ] +1, Approve the release >> > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release >> > (please provide specific comments) >> > > >> > > The complete staging area is available >> > for your review, which includes: >> > > * JIRA release notes [1], >> > > * the official Apache source release to >> > be deployed to dist.apache.org >> > <http://dist.apache.org> >> > > <http://dist.apache.org> [2], which is >> > signed with the key with >> > > fingerprint >> > 6356C1A9F089B0FA3DE8753688934A6699985948 >> [3], >> > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the >> > Maven Central Repository [4], >> > > * source code tag "v2.13.0-RC2" [5], >> > > * website pull request listing the >> > release [6] and publishing the API >> > > reference manual [7]. >> > > * Python artifacts are deployed along >> > with the source release to the >> > > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> >> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2]. >> > > * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.13.0 >> > release to help with validation >> > > [8]. >> > > >> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 >> > hours. It is adopted by majority >> > > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative >> > votes. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Ankur >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > >> > >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12345166 >> > > [2] >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.13.0/ >> > > [3] >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >> > > [4] >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1070/ >> > > [5] >> > >> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.13.0-RC2 >> > > [6] >> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8645 >> > > [7] >> > >> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/589 >> > > [8] >> > > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1031196952 >> > >> > -- >> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto: >> jbono...@apache.org> >> > http://blog.nanthrax.net >> > Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > >> >
