Thanks, Ankur, for driving the release. Do we have a draft of user-friendly
summary of release notes with high-level changes somewhere? If so, please
tag me on a document or a PR, or post the link in this thread. Thank you!

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:38 PM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
> Thanks for validating the release and voting.
> With 0(-1), 6(+1) and 3(+1 binding) votes, I am concluding the voting
> process.
> I am going ahead with the release and will keep the community posted with
> the updates.
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 Reviewed the Nexmark java and SQL perfkit graphs, no obvious
>> regressions over the previous release.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:15 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:40 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, i meant i will close the voting at 5pm and start the release
>>>> process.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 10:59 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ankur, did you mean to say your going to close the vote today at 5pm?
>>>>> (and then complete the release afterwards)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:54 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for validating and voting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have 4 binding votes.
>>>>>> I will complete the release today 5PM. Please raise any concerns
>>>>>> before that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Ankur
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:36 AM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the gearpump issue has been ongoing since 2.10, I can't
>>>>>>> consider it a blocker for this release and am voting +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quickly tested on beam-samples.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 31/05/2019 04:52, Ankur Goenka wrote:
>>>>>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>>>>>> > 2.13.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>> > <http://dist.apache.org> [2], which is signed with the key with
>>>>>>>> > fingerprint 6356C1A9F089B0FA3DE8753688934A6699985948 [3],
>>>>>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository
>>>>>>>> [4],
>>>>>>>> > * source code tag "v2.13.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>>>>> > * website pull request listing the release [6] and publishing the
>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>> > reference manual [7].
>>>>>>>> > * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> > dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>>>>>>> > * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.13.0 release to help with
>>>>>>>> validation
>>>>>>>> > [8].
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>>> > Ankur
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [1]
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12345166
>>>>>>>> > [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.13.0/
>>>>>>>> > [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>> > [4]
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1070/
>>>>>>>> > [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.13.0-RC2
>>>>>>>> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8645
>>>>>>>> > [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/589
>>>>>>>> > [8]
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1031196952
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to