On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:29 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@apache.org> wrote: > 52 and 37 for me. I don't know what 53 is, but I like it too.
Same. What about 37 with the eyes from 52? > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:19 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> More logos :D >> >> (35) - (37), (51), (48), (53) go into the direction of cuttlefish. >> >> From the new ones I like (52) because of the eyes. (53) If we want to >> move into the direction of a water animal, the small ones are quite >> recognizable. Also, (23) and (36) are kinda cute. >> >> Cheers, >> Max >> >> On 12.11.19 02:09, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> > Cuttlefish are cool, but I don't know how recognizable they are, and >> > they don't scream "fast" or "stream-y" or "parallel processing" to me >> > (not that that's a requirement...) I like that firefly, nice working >> > the logo into the trailing beam of light. >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:03 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Dumbo octopus anyone? https://youtu.be/DmqikqvLLLw?t=263 >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:06 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> The real answer, what cool schwag can we get based upon the mascot. >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 2:04 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm with Luke on cuttlefish. We can have color changing schwag... >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM David Cavazos <dcava...@google.com> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I like 9 as well. Not related to anything, but chinchillas are also >> >>>>> cute. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 8:25 AM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> 9 and 7 for me (in that order) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 7:18 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here are some sketches from the designer. I've put them all in one >> >>>>>>> image >> >>>>>>> and added labels to make it easier to refer to them. My favorites are >> >>>>>>> (2) and (9). >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Cheers, >> >>>>>>> Max >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On 09.11.19 19:43, Maximilian Michels wrote: >> >>>>>>>> I like that sketch! The designer has also sent me some rough >> >>>>>>>> sketches, >> >>>>>>>> I'll share these here when I get consent from the designer. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -Max >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 09.11.19 19:22, Alex Van Boxel wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> +1 for a FireFly. Ok, I can't draw, but it's to make a point ;-) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Fire2.jpg >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> _/ >> >>>>>>>>> _/ Alex Van Boxel >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 12:26 AM Kyle Weaver <kcwea...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:kcwea...@google.com>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Re fish: The authors of the Streaming Systems went with >> >>>>>>>>> trout, but >> >>>>>>>>> the book mentioned a missed opportunity to make their cover a >> >>>>>>>>> "robot >> >>>>>>>>> dinosaur with a Scottish accent." Perhaps that idea is worth >> >>>>>>>>> revisiting? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 3:20 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> My top suggestion is a cuttlefish. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:28 PM Reza Rokni >> >>>>>>>>> <r...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:r...@google.com>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Salmon... they love streams? :-) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 12:00, Kenneth Knowles >> >>>>>>>>> <k...@apache.org <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Agree with Aizhamal that it doesn't matter if >> >>>>>>>>> they are >> >>>>>>>>> taken if they are not too close in space to Beam: >> >>>>>>>>> Apache >> >>>>>>>>> projects, big data, log processing, stream >> >>>>>>>>> processing. >> >>>>>>>>> Not a legal opinion, but an aesthetic opinion. So >> >>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> would keep Lemur as a possibility. Definitely >> >>>>>>>>> nginx is >> >>>>>>>>> far away from Beam so it seems OK as long as the >> >>>>>>>>> art is >> >>>>>>>>> different. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Also FWIW there are many kinds of Lemurs, and also >> >>>>>>>>> related Tarsier, of the only uncontroversial and >> >>>>>>>>> non-extinct infraorder within suborder >> >>>>>>>>> Strepsirrhini. I >> >>>>>>>>> think there's enough room for another mascot with >> >>>>>>>>> big >> >>>>>>>>> glowing eyes :-). The difference in the >> >>>>>>>>> designer's art >> >>>>>>>>> will be more significant than the taxonomy. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Kenn >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:37 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat >> >>>>>>>>> kyzy >> >>>>>>>>> <aizha...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Aww.. that Hoover beaver is cute. But then >> >>>>>>>>> lemur is >> >>>>>>>>> also "taken" [1] and the owl too [2]. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't think it matters much >> >>>>>>>>> which >> >>>>>>>>> mascots are taken, as long as the project is >> >>>>>>>>> not too >> >>>>>>>>> close in the same space as Beam. Also, it's >> >>>>>>>>> good to >> >>>>>>>>> just get all ideas out. We should still >> >>>>>>>>> consider >> >>>>>>>>> hedgehogs. I looked up fireflies, they don't >> >>>>>>>>> look >> >>>>>>>>> nice, but i am not dismissing the idea :/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> And thanks for reaching out to designers, >> >>>>>>>>> Max. To >> >>>>>>>>> your point: >> >>>>>>>>> >how do we arrive at a concrete design >> >>>>>>>>> >once we have consensus on the type of >> >>>>>>>>> mascot? >> >>>>>>>>> My thinking is that the designer will come up >> >>>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>> few sketches, then we vote on one here in the >> >>>>>>>>> dev@ >> >>>>>>>>> list. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> https://www.nginx.com/blog/introducing-the-lemur-stack-and-an-official-nginx-mascot/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [2] >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> https://blog.readme.io/why-every-startup-needs-a-mascot/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 5:31 AM Maximilian >> >>>>>>>>> Michels >> >>>>>>>>> <m...@apache.org <mailto:m...@apache.org>> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Quick update: The mentioned designer has >> >>>>>>>>> gotten >> >>>>>>>>> back to me and offered >> >>>>>>>>> to sketch something until the end of the >> >>>>>>>>> week. >> >>>>>>>>> I've pointed him to this >> >>>>>>>>> thread and the existing logo material: >> >>>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/community/logos/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [I don't want to interrupt the discussion >> >>>>>>>>> in any >> >>>>>>>>> way, I just think >> >>>>>>>>> having something concrete will help us to >> >>>>>>>>> eventually decide what we want.] >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On 05.11.19 12:49, Maximilian Michels >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> > How about fireflies in the Beam light >> >>>>>>>>> rays? ;) >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> >> Feels like "Beam" would go well with >> >>>>>>>>> an >> >>>>>>>>> animal that has glowing bright >> >>>>>>>>> >> eyes such as a lemur >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > I love the lemur idea because it has >> >>>>>>>>> almost >> >>>>>>>>> orange eyes. >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > Thanks for starting this Aizhamal! I've >> >>>>>>>>> recently talked to a designer >> >>>>>>>>> > which is somewhat famous for creating >> >>>>>>>>> logos. >> >>>>>>>>> He was inclined to work on >> >>>>>>>>> > a software project logo. Of course >> >>>>>>>>> there is a >> >>>>>>>>> little bit of a price tag >> >>>>>>>>> > attached, though the quote sounded >> >>>>>>>>> reasonable. >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > It raises the general question, how do >> >>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>> arrive at a concrete design >> >>>>>>>>> > once we have consensus on the type of >> >>>>>>>>> mascot? >> >>>>>>>>> I believe there are also >> >>>>>>>>> > designers working at companies using >> >>>>>>>>> Beam ;) >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > Cheers, >> >>>>>>>>> > Max >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > On 05.11.19 06:14, Eugene Kirpichov >> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> Feels like "Beam" would go well with >> >>>>>>>>> an >> >>>>>>>>> animal that has glowing bright >> >>>>>>>>> >> eyes (with beams of light shooting >> >>>>>>>>> out of >> >>>>>>>>> them), such as a lemur [1] >> >>>>>>>>> >> or an owl. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> [1] >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/madagascar-lemurs/index.html >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kenneth >> >>>>>>>>> Knowles <k...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k...@apache.org> >> >>>>>>>>> >> <mailto:k...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:k...@apache.org>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Yes! Let's have a mascot! >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Direct connections often have >> >>>>>>>>> duplicates. For example in the log >> >>>>>>>>> >> processing space, there is >> >>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/hooverbeaver >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I like a flying squirrel, but >> >>>>>>>>> Flink >> >>>>>>>>> already is a squirrel. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Hedgehog? I could not find any >> >>>>>>>>> source of >> >>>>>>>>> confusion for this one. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Kenn >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 6:02 PM >> >>>>>>>>> Robert >> >>>>>>>>> Burke <rob...@frantil.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:rob...@frantil.com> >> >>>>>>>>> >> <mailto:rob...@frantil.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:rob...@frantil.com>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> As both a Canadian, and the >> >>>>>>>>> resident >> >>>>>>>>> fan of a programming >> >>>>>>>>> >> language with a rodent >> >>>>>>>>> mascot, I >> >>>>>>>>> endorse this mascot. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, 4:11 PM >> >>>>>>>>> David >> >>>>>>>>> Cavazos <dcava...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dcava...@google.com> >> >>>>>>>>> >> <mailto:dcava...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dcava...@google.com>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I like it, a beaver could >> >>>>>>>>> be a >> >>>>>>>>> cute mascot :) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at >> >>>>>>>>> 3:33 PM >> >>>>>>>>> Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy >> >>>>>>>>> >> <aizha...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org> >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Hi everybody, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I think the idea of >> >>>>>>>>> creating >> >>>>>>>>> a Beam mascot has been >> >>>>>>>>> >> brought up a couple >> >>>>>>>>> times >> >>>>>>>>> here in the past, but I would >> >>>>>>>>> >> like us to go through >> >>>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>> it this time if we are all in >> >>>>>>>>> >> agreement:) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> We can brainstorm in >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> thread what the mascot should >> >>>>>>>>> >> be given Beam’s >> >>>>>>>>> characteristics and principles. What do >> >>>>>>>>> >> you all think? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> For example, I am >> >>>>>>>>> proposing >> >>>>>>>>> a beaver as a mascot, >> >>>>>>>>> >> because: >> >>>>>>>>> >> 1. Beavers build dams >> >>>>>>>>> out of >> >>>>>>>>> logs for streams >> >>>>>>>>> >> 2. The name is close >> >>>>>>>>> to Beam >> >>>>>>>>> >> 3. And with the right >> >>>>>>>>> imagination, you can make a really >> >>>>>>>>> >> cute beaver :D >> >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/gallery/RLo05M9 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> WDYT? If you don’t >> >>>>>>>>> like the >> >>>>>>>>> beaver, what are the other >> >>>>>>>>> >> options that you >> >>>>>>>>> think could >> >>>>>>>>> be appropriate? I would >> >>>>>>>>> >> like to invite others >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> propose ideas and get the >> >>>>>>>>> >> discussions going. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>> >> Aizhamal >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, 4:11 PM >> >>>>>>>>> David >> >>>>>>>>> Cavazos <dcava...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dcava...@google.com> >> >>>>>>>>> >> <mailto:dcava...@google.com >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:dcava...@google.com>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I like it, a beaver could >> >>>>>>>>> be a >> >>>>>>>>> cute mascot :) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at >> >>>>>>>>> 3:33 PM >> >>>>>>>>> Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy >> >>>>>>>>> >> <aizha...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org> >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:aizha...@apache.org>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Hi everybody, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> I think the idea of >> >>>>>>>>> creating >> >>>>>>>>> a Beam mascot has been >> >>>>>>>>> >> brought up a couple >> >>>>>>>>> times >> >>>>>>>>> here in the past, but I would >> >>>>>>>>> >> like us to go through >> >>>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>> it this time if we are all in >> >>>>>>>>> >> agreement:) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> We can brainstorm in >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> thread what the mascot should >> >>>>>>>>> >> be given Beam’s >> >>>>>>>>> characteristics and principles. What do >> >>>>>>>>> >> you all think? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> For example, I am >> >>>>>>>>> proposing >> >>>>>>>>> a beaver as a mascot, >> >>>>>>>>> >> because: >> >>>>>>>>> >> 1. Beavers build dams >> >>>>>>>>> out of >> >>>>>>>>> logs for streams >> >>>>>>>>> >> 2. The name is close >> >>>>>>>>> to Beam >> >>>>>>>>> >> 3. And with the right >> >>>>>>>>> imagination, you can make a really >> >>>>>>>>> >> cute beaver :D >> >>>>>>>>> https://imgur.com/gallery/RLo05M9 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> WDYT? If you don’t >> >>>>>>>>> like the >> >>>>>>>>> beaver, what are the other >> >>>>>>>>> >> options that you >> >>>>>>>>> think could >> >>>>>>>>> be appropriate? I would >> >>>>>>>>> >> like to invite others >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> propose ideas and get the >> >>>>>>>>> >> discussions going. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>> >> Aizhamal >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>>> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you >> >>>>>>>>> received this communication by mistake, please don't >> >>>>>>>>> forward >> >>>>>>>>> it to anyone else, please erase all copies and >> >>>>>>>>> attachments, >> >>>>>>>>> and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong >> >>>>>>>>> person. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The above terms reflect a potential business >> >>>>>>>>> arrangement, >> >>>>>>>>> are provided solely as a basis for further >> >>>>>>>>> discussion, and >> >>>>>>>>> are not intended to be and do not constitute a legally >> >>>>>>>>> binding obligation. No legally binding obligations >> >>>>>>>>> will be >> >>>>>>>>> created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in >> >>>>>>>>> final >> >>>>>>>>> form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >> >>>>>>>>>
