My top suggestion is a cuttlefish.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:28 PM Reza Rokni <r...@google.com> wrote:

> Salmon... they love streams? :-)
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 12:00, Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Agree with Aizhamal that it doesn't matter if they are taken if they are
>> not too close in space to Beam: Apache projects, big data, log processing,
>> stream processing. Not a legal opinion, but an aesthetic opinion. So I
>> would keep Lemur as a possibility. Definitely nginx is far away from Beam
>> so it seems OK as long as the art is different.
>>
>> Also FWIW there are many kinds of Lemurs, and also related Tarsier, of
>> the only uncontroversial and non-extinct infraorder within
>> suborder Strepsirrhini. I think there's enough room for another mascot with
>> big glowing eyes :-). The difference in the designer's art will be more
>> significant than the taxonomy.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:37 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Aww.. that Hoover beaver is cute. But then lemur is also "taken" [1] and
>>> the owl too [2].
>>>
>>> Personally, I don't think it matters much which mascots are taken, as
>>> long as the project is not too close in the same space as Beam. Also, it's
>>> good to just get all ideas out. We should still consider hedgehogs. I
>>> looked up fireflies, they don't look nice, but i am not dismissing the idea
>>> :/
>>>
>>> And thanks for reaching out to designers, Max. To your point:
>>> >how do we arrive at a concrete design
>>> >once we have consensus on the type of mascot?
>>> My thinking is that the designer will come up with few sketches, then we
>>> vote on one here in the dev@ list.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://www.nginx.com/blog/introducing-the-lemur-stack-and-an-official-nginx-mascot/
>>> [2] https://blog.readme.io/why-every-startup-needs-a-mascot/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 5:31 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quick update: The mentioned designer has gotten back to me and offered
>>>> to sketch something until the end of the week. I've pointed him to this
>>>> thread and the existing logo material:
>>>> https://beam.apache.org/community/logos/
>>>>
>>>> [I don't want to interrupt the discussion in any way, I just think
>>>> having something concrete will help us to eventually decide what we
>>>> want.]
>>>>
>>>> On 05.11.19 12:49, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>>>> > How about fireflies in the Beam light rays? ;)
>>>> >
>>>> >> Feels like "Beam" would go well with an animal that has glowing
>>>> bright
>>>> >> eyes such as a lemur
>>>> >
>>>> > I love the lemur idea because it has almost orange eyes.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for starting this Aizhamal! I've recently talked to a designer
>>>> > which is somewhat famous for creating logos. He was inclined to work
>>>> on
>>>> > a software project logo. Of course there is a little bit of a price
>>>> tag
>>>> > attached, though the quote sounded reasonable.
>>>> >
>>>> > It raises the general question, how do we arrive at a concrete design
>>>> > once we have consensus on the type of mascot? I believe there are
>>>> also
>>>> > designers working at companies using Beam ;)
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Max
>>>> >
>>>> > On 05.11.19 06:14, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:
>>>> >> Feels like "Beam" would go well with an animal that has glowing
>>>> bright
>>>> >> eyes (with beams of light shooting out of them), such as a lemur [1]
>>>> >> or an owl.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [1] https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/madagascar-lemurs/index.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org
>>>> >> <mailto:k...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     Yes! Let's have a mascot!
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     Direct connections often have duplicates. For example in the log
>>>> >>     processing space, there is
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/hooverbeaver
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     I like a flying squirrel, but Flink already is a squirrel.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     Hedgehog? I could not find any source of confusion for this one.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     Kenn
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>     On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 6:02 PM Robert Burke <rob...@frantil.com
>>>> >>     <mailto:rob...@frantil.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>         As both a Canadian, and the resident fan of a programming
>>>> >>         language with a rodent mascot, I endorse this mascot.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>         On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, 4:11 PM David Cavazos <
>>>> dcava...@google.com
>>>> >>         <mailto:dcava...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>             I like it, a beaver could be a cute mascot :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>             On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:33 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>>>> >>             <aizha...@apache.org <mailto:aizha...@apache.org>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 Hi everybody,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 I think the idea of creating a Beam mascot has been
>>>> >>                 brought up a couple times here in the past, but I
>>>> would
>>>> >>                 like us to go through with it this time if we are
>>>> all in
>>>> >>                 agreement:)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 We can brainstorm in this thread what the mascot
>>>> should
>>>> >>                 be given Beam’s characteristics and principles. What
>>>> do
>>>> >>                 you all think?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 For example, I am proposing a beaver as a mascot,
>>>> >> because:
>>>> >>                 1. Beavers build dams out of logs for streams
>>>> >>                 2. The name is close to Beam
>>>> >>                 3. And with the right imagination, you can make a
>>>> really
>>>> >>                 cute beaver :D https://imgur.com/gallery/RLo05M9
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 WDYT? If you don’t like the beaver, what are the
>>>> other
>>>> >>                 options that you think could be appropriate? I would
>>>> >>                 like to invite others to propose ideas and get the
>>>> >>                 discussions going.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 Thanks,
>>>> >>                 Aizhamal
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>         On Mon, Nov 4, 2019, 4:11 PM David Cavazos <
>>>> dcava...@google.com
>>>> >>         <mailto:dcava...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>             I like it, a beaver could be a cute mascot :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>             On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:33 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
>>>> >>             <aizha...@apache.org <mailto:aizha...@apache.org>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 Hi everybody,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 I think the idea of creating a Beam mascot has been
>>>> >>                 brought up a couple times here in the past, but I
>>>> would
>>>> >>                 like us to go through with it this time if we are
>>>> all in
>>>> >>                 agreement:)
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 We can brainstorm in this thread what the mascot
>>>> should
>>>> >>                 be given Beam’s characteristics and principles. What
>>>> do
>>>> >>                 you all think?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 For example, I am proposing a beaver as a mascot,
>>>> >> because:
>>>> >>                 1. Beavers build dams out of logs for streams
>>>> >>                 2. The name is close to Beam
>>>> >>                 3. And with the right imagination, you can make a
>>>> really
>>>> >>                 cute beaver :D https://imgur.com/gallery/RLo05M9
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 WDYT? If you don’t like the beaver, what are the
>>>> other
>>>> >>                 options that you think could be appropriate? I would
>>>> >>                 like to invite others to propose ideas and get the
>>>> >>                 discussions going.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>                 Thanks,
>>>> >>                 Aizhamal
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
>
> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this
> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone
> to the wrong person.
>
> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided
> solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do
> not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations
> will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is
> executed in writing by all parties involved.
>

Reply via email to