+1
Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner
> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC.
>
> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote:
>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and
>> examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency
>> compatibility.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Cham
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the validations.
>> >>
>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled
>> >> internally. The error should be fixed now.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]
>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications.
>> >>>
>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>> >>> "Back-off pulling image
>> >>> \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> >>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"",
>> >>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff:
>> >>> "Back-off pulling image
>> >>> \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\
>> >>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>""
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]
>> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing
>> >>>> Dataflow templates.
>> >>>> Best
>> >>>> -P.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]
>> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct
>> >>>>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I
>> >>>>> wanted to start the validation as much as possible.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ahmet
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]
>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko
>> >>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were
>> >>>>>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any
>> >>>>>>> regressions.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683
>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683> and
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733
>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733> - These are
>> >>>>>> flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for 2.32.0.
>> >>>>>> I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If there
>> >>>>>> will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330
>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764
>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764> - This was
>> >>>>>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165
>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165>. We can ignore this for
>> >>>>>> 2.32.0 release.
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766
>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766> - this is another
>> >>>>>> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after
>> >>>>>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859
>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859>). This is probably also
>> >>>>>> not worth fixing for 2.32.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]
>> >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko
>> >>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur!
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I
>> >>>>>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <[email protected]
>> >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>> >>>>>>>> 2.32.0, as follows:
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>> >>>>>>>> comments)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>> >>>>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if
>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>> >>>>>>>> includes:
>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed with
>> >>>>>>>> the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3],
>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5],
>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>> >>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and
>> >>>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181.
>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to
>> >>>>>>>> the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2].
>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with
>> >>>>>>>> validation [9].
>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> >>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check
>> >>>>>>>> out our blog post at
>> >>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/
>> >>>>>>>> <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992>
>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/
>> >>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/>
>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>> >>>>>>>> [4]
>> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/>
>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1
>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1>
>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317
>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317>
>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618
>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618>
>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324
>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324>
>> >>>>>>>> [9]
>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107>
>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>> >>>>>>>> <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
