Ankur, could you take a look on this branch? https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32>
Is it a "false duplicate" of https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32.0 <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/release-2.32.0> or something else? — Alexey > On 25 Aug 2021, at 20:10, Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote: > > Update: > We have 8 votes in favor of release and 3 of them are binding. > I will wait till 25 Aug 6 PM PST to start finalizing the release. > > Thanks for helping with the validations. > > Thanks, > Ankur > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested a few more configurations. > > Kenn > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Alexey Romanenko <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 > Tested by beam-samples and Spark Runner > >> On 24 Aug 2021, at 10:14, Jan Lukavský <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Validated my downstream dependencies build fine against the RC. >> >> On 8/23/21 11:48 PM, Valentyn Tymofieiev wrote: >>> +1, ran several Python batch and streaming pipelines from quickstarts and >>> examples without issues and checked Dataflow containers for dependency >>> compatibility. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 2:41 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> +1 (binding). The artifacts and signatures look good to me. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:24 PM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (binding) >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Cham >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Thanks for the validations. >>> >> >>> >> As for the errors. Externally built containers were not pulled >>> >> internally. The error should be fixed now. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected] >>> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Are Dataflow containers not available yet ? >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm getting following when running some verifications. >>> >>> >>> >>> [failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-0-0" with ImagePullBackOff: >>> >>> "Back-off pulling image >>> >>> \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ >>> >>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"", >>> >>> failed to "StartContainer" for "sdk-2-0" with ImagePullBackOff: >>> >>> "Back-off pulling image >>> >>> \"gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0\ >>> >>> <http://gcr.io/cloud-dataflow/v1beta3/beam_java11_sdk:2.32.0%5C>"" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 7:53 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected] >>> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> +1 >>> >>>> I validated by building and running basic unit tests on existing >>> >>>> Dataflow templates. >>> >>>> Best >>> >>>> -P. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:52 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected] >>> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> +1 on the RC. I validated python quick start examples on direct >>> >>>>> runners. Thank you Ankur for preparing this. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I understand if we need to start a new RC for the open issues, but I >>> >>>>> wanted to start the validation as much as possible. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Ahmet >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:45 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected] >>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:19 PM Alexey Romanenko >>> >>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right, Ahmet. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Though, I just wanted to confirm if the current open P0 issues were >>> >>>>>>> introduced after "release-2.32.0" branch cut and we don’t have any >>> >>>>>>> regressions. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Good point. I looked at the currently open P0s, there are 4 four: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683 >>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12683> and >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733 >>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12733> - These are >>> >>>>>> flakiness issues in integration tests. Same tests existed for >>> >>>>>> 2.32.0. I do not think it is worth cherry picking the fix in RC1. If >>> >>>>>> there will be a RC2, we can choose to cherry pick >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330 >>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15330> >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764 >>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12764> - This was >>> >>>>>> introduced after release-2.32.0 in >>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165 >>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15165>. We can ignore this for >>> >>>>>> 2.32.0 release. >>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766 >>> >>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12766> - this is another >>> >>>>>> flaky integration test, and IIUC it got more flaky after >>> >>>>>> release-2.32.0 (after https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859 >>> >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14859>). This is probably also >>> >>>>>> not worth fixing for 2.32.0 >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 18:26, Ahmet Altay <[email protected] >>> >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 8:14 AM Alexey Romanenko >>> >>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, Ankur! >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> There are several P0 opened issues. They don’t affect this release? >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> I do not see any P0 open issues marked for 2.32.0 release [1]. Am I >>> >>>>>>> missing something? Perhaps you are looking at the 2.33.0 release? >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> [1] >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.32.0%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> On 20 Aug 2021, at 06:49, Ankur Goenka <[email protected] >>> >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>> >>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version >>> >>>>>>>> 2.32.0, as follows: >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release >>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific >>> >>>>>>>> comments) >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the >>> >>>>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if >>> >>>>>>>> no issues are found. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which >>> >>>>>>>> includes: >>> >>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], >>> >>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to >>> >>>>>>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2], which is signed >>> >>>>>>>> with the key with fingerprint A6699985948 [3], >>> >>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4], >>> >>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.32.0-RC1" [5], >>> >>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API >>> >>>>>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8]. >>> >>>>>>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven Gradle 6.8.3 and >>> >>>>>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK 1.8.0_181. >>> >>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to >>> >>>>>>>> the dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org/> [2]. >>> >>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.32.0 release to help with >>> >>>>>>>> validation [9]. >>> >>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10]. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by >>> >>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> For guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check >>> >>>>>>>> out our blog post at >>> >>>>>>>> https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/ >>> >>>>>>>> <https://beam.apache.org/blog/validate-beam-release/>. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>> >>>>>>>> Release Manager >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> [1] >>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992 >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12349992> >>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/ >>> >>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.32.0/> >>> >>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS >>> >>>>>>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS> >>> >>>>>>>> [4] >>> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/ >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1223/> >>> >>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1 >>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.32.0-RC1> >>> >>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317 >>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15317> >>> >>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618 >>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/618> >>> >>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324 >>> >>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15324> >>> >>>>>>>> [9] >>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107 >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1747256107> >>> >>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image >>> >>>>>>>> <https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >
