Absolutely! Here is a link to the full proposed logo <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52MmlkWHk2bWQ3bW8/view?usp=sharing>. Here is the proposed condensed (icon) logo <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52cGEycG16T1UwS2M/view?usp=sharing> .
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi James, > > it's not possible to send attachment on the Apache mailing list. > > Can you share the logo proposal on gist, google drive, or a HTTP server ? > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On 02/18/2016 08:46 AM, James Malone wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> We're at the point where I think Beam needs a logo. >> >> Originally, the name Beam was proposed to mix Batch + strEAM into one >> name (hence Beam). A designer, Stephanie Smythies, graciously dedicated >> some of her time to create a logo concept for the project. I wanted to >> share that design and propose we adopt it as the logo (and design) for >> the project. >> >> >> >> This logo is a 'B' which ties closely to the project name, the concept >> of light beams, and the merge of patch and streaming (via the lights in >> the 'B'). Moreover, it is colorful, bright, and fresh (imho, of course.) >> >> For a smaller logo (site icons and such) we can use the following: >> >> >> >> What does everyone think? If this logo looks good, I also propose we >> redesign the current Beam site and materials to match the design, >> colors, and typeface. >> >> Cheers! >> >> James >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
