Love it!

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:38 AM, James Malone <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Absolutely!
>
> Here is a link to the full proposed logo
> <
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52MmlkWHk2bWQ3bW8/view?usp=sharing
> >.
> Here is the proposed condensed (icon) logo
> <
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-IhJZh9Ab52cGEycG16T1UwS2M/view?usp=sharing
> >
> .
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > it's not possible to send attachment on the Apache mailing list.
> >
> > Can you share the logo proposal on gist, google drive, or a HTTP server ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 02/18/2016 08:46 AM, James Malone wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> We're at the point where I think Beam needs a logo.
> >>
> >> Originally, the name Beam was proposed to mix Batch + strEAM into one
> >> name (hence Beam). A designer, Stephanie Smythies, graciously dedicated
> >> some of her time to create a logo concept for the project. I wanted to
> >> share that design and propose we adopt it as the logo (and design) for
> >> the project.
> >>
> >>
> >> ​
> >> This logo is a 'B' which ties closely to the project name, the concept
> >> of light beams, and the merge of patch and streaming (via the lights in
> >> the 'B'). Moreover, it is colorful, bright, and fresh (imho, of course.)
> >>
> >> For a smaller logo (site icons and such) we can use the following:
> >>
> >>
> >> ​
> >> What does everyone think? If this logo looks good, I also propose we
> >> redesign the current Beam site and materials to match the design,
> >> colors, and typeface.
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >>
> >> James
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > [email protected]
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>

Reply via email to