Yeah, if it's complicated at all, I agree. Daryl Olander wrote:
>+1 to doing the real fix post 1.0 > >On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I take it back...this isn't a straightforward thing to fix >>unfortunately because it affects the Ant used to provide the runtime >>in both the distribution and SVN builds. >> >>It wouldn't be hard to change it, but if we're going to do that, we >>should add the beehive-netui-validator-config.xml file (and consider >>adding web.xml) to those as well... >> >>I agree (now) having them checked in is the right thing unless we >>want to tackle the bigger problem of copying all of the config files. >>And, I'd rather ship 1.0 and fix that later. :) >> >>Eddie >> >> >> >>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>OK, I certainly don't have an objection to that... thanks. >>>Rich >>> >>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Right, it doesn't *have* to happen now, but doing it now ensures >>>>that we're consistent. So, I'm going to go ahead and fix while you're >>>>getting the compiler change in. >>>> >>>>:) >>>> >>>>Eddie >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Rich Feit wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I haven't started it -- it doesn't seem like anything that has to go >>>>>into v1, right? Just checking. I did update the checked-in files to >>>>> >>>>> >>be >> >> >>>>>of the right version -- this is just the longer-term fix to ensure >>>>> >>>>> >>that >> >> >>>>>this doesn't happen again... :) >>>>> >>>>>Rich >>>>> >>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Rich-- >>>>>> >>>>>>Have you started fixing BEEHIVE-914 yet? If not, let me know and >>>>>>I'll take that one. >>>>>> >>>>>>Eddie >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > > >
