Oh, I just meant we should take a week to have people play with it if we put it in for 1.0, that's all. I think we'd want to get it into the docs, too, especially where there are instructions for copying netui-blank, etc. What do you think about that?
I'd definitely take a look at the diff, though, even if it's something we hold until v1.1. Rich Eddie O'Neil wrote: > Yeah -- I don't think it would take a week (probably just a couple >of hours), but it's a little different than how we do things right now >because we need to support two scenarios: > > - create a new webapp > - inject the runtime files (JARs / resources) into the samples > >We've got the latter and could easily add the former. > > But, we'll get very little test mileage on it in the near term. I >can take a crack at it and see what you think of the diff... > >Eddie > > > >On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Definitely, this would be a great thing to have. I have a local script >>that does exactly this -- in retrospect, this should have made me think >>of an ant target. I think it's something that we should do for 1.1, >>unless we want to delay the release for a week or so... >> >>Rich >> >>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >> >> >> >>> It's complicated. :) >>> >>> We really need a target that can "seed" a Beehive webapp including >>>all of the validation config files, runtime JARs, and NetUI URL >>>addressable resources. Today, this is done using a command like: >>> >>> cp -rf samples/netui-blank <project-dir> >>> ant -f ant/beehive-runtime.xml deploy.beehive.webapp.runtime >>>-Dwebapp.dir=<project-dir> >>> >>>If, for example, you just do the latter, you'll end up with a webapp >>>that has the runtime but no web.xml or validation config files. And, >>>that's kind of bad... >>> >>> Would be *very* nice to have a target that just does: >>> >>>ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.beehive.webapp -Dproject.dir=... >>> >>>It could even prompt for the project.dir -- kind of like a new project >>>wizard in Ant. >>> >>> We could do this for 1.0, but it's not an insignificant change. >>>It's *definitely* something we need for 1.1... >>> >>>Eddie >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Yeah, if it's complicated at all, I agree. >>>> >>>>Daryl Olander wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>+1 to doing the real fix post 1.0 >>>>> >>>>>On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I take it back...this isn't a straightforward thing to fix >>>>>>unfortunately because it affects the Ant used to provide the runtime >>>>>>in both the distribution and SVN builds. >>>>>> >>>>>>It wouldn't be hard to change it, but if we're going to do that, we >>>>>>should add the beehive-netui-validator-config.xml file (and consider >>>>>>adding web.xml) to those as well... >>>>>> >>>>>>I agree (now) having them checked in is the right thing unless we >>>>>>want to tackle the bigger problem of copying all of the config files. >>>>>>And, I'd rather ship 1.0 and fix that later. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Eddie >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>OK, I certainly don't have an objection to that... thanks. >>>>>>>Rich >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Right, it doesn't *have* to happen now, but doing it now ensures >>>>>>>>that we're consistent. So, I'm going to go ahead and fix while you're >>>>>>>>getting the compiler change in. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>:) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Eddie >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Rich Feit wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I haven't started it -- it doesn't seem like anything that has to go >>>>>>>>>into v1, right? Just checking. I did update the checked-in files to >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>be >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>of the right version -- this is just the longer-term fix to ensure >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>that >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>this doesn't happen again... :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Rich >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Rich-- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Have you started fixing BEEHIVE-914 yet? If not, let me know and >>>>>>>>>>I'll take that one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Eddie >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > > >
