It's complicated. :) We really need a target that can "seed" a Beehive webapp including all of the validation config files, runtime JARs, and NetUI URL addressable resources. Today, this is done using a command like:
cp -rf samples/netui-blank <project-dir> ant -f ant/beehive-runtime.xml deploy.beehive.webapp.runtime -Dwebapp.dir=<project-dir> If, for example, you just do the latter, you'll end up with a webapp that has the runtime but no web.xml or validation config files. And, that's kind of bad... Would be *very* nice to have a target that just does: ant -f beehive-imports.xml new.beehive.webapp -Dproject.dir=... It could even prompt for the project.dir -- kind of like a new project wizard in Ant. We could do this for 1.0, but it's not an insignificant change. It's *definitely* something we need for 1.1... Eddie On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, if it's complicated at all, I agree. > > Daryl Olander wrote: > > >+1 to doing the real fix post 1.0 > > > >On 9/9/05, Eddie O'Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>I take it back...this isn't a straightforward thing to fix > >>unfortunately because it affects the Ant used to provide the runtime > >>in both the distribution and SVN builds. > >> > >>It wouldn't be hard to change it, but if we're going to do that, we > >>should add the beehive-netui-validator-config.xml file (and consider > >>adding web.xml) to those as well... > >> > >>I agree (now) having them checked in is the right thing unless we > >>want to tackle the bigger problem of copying all of the config files. > >>And, I'd rather ship 1.0 and fix that later. :) > >> > >>Eddie > >> > >> > >> > >>On 9/9/05, Rich Feit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>OK, I certainly don't have an objection to that... thanks. > >>>Rich > >>> > >>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Right, it doesn't *have* to happen now, but doing it now ensures > >>>>that we're consistent. So, I'm going to go ahead and fix while you're > >>>>getting the compiler change in. > >>>> > >>>>:) > >>>> > >>>>Eddie > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Rich Feit wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>I haven't started it -- it doesn't seem like anything that has to go > >>>>>into v1, right? Just checking. I did update the checked-in files to > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>be > >> > >> > >>>>>of the right version -- this is just the longer-term fix to ensure > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>that > >> > >> > >>>>>this doesn't happen again... :) > >>>>> > >>>>>Rich > >>>>> > >>>>>Eddie O'Neil wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Rich-- > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Have you started fixing BEEHIVE-914 yet? If not, let me know and > >>>>>>I'll take that one. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Eddie > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > > > > > >
