Hi bibliographers, Zitat von David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe we should go through the list of enhancements and bugs and propose a > list sorted by priority and try to get them rescheduled.
I did just this today and browsed through the list of 29 bibliographic issues. I ranked them concerning implementatbility and usefulness (if applies) and sorted them between OOo2.0 relevant and OOoBib (later) relevant. Also I commented on the task issues I found. I would like you to review the attached document and give feedback. This is only a "working document", so I did not make much fuss about formatting and such. If you know any other open bibliography-related issues that I have not included or if you have issues that are not yet reported but could be fixed relatively easy, let me know! AFTER your review and comments are integrated I would like to put the document in our documents secion. I hope this might one day help the "poor" OOo2.0 users. ;-) Matthias Basler [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------- This mail was sent through http://webmail.uni-jena.de
OOo bibliographic issues review.sxw
Description: OpenOffice Writer document
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
