Matthias,
The document is very useful, I will read through it and reply
soon. I also
noticed that you have cleaned up some duplicate issues, thanks for that too.
David
On Monday 28 February 2005 8:36 am, Matthias Basler wrote:
> Hi bibliographers,
>
> Zitat von David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Maybe we should go through the list of enhancements and bugs and propose
> > a list sorted by priority and try to get them rescheduled.
>
> I did just this today and browsed through the list of 29 bibliographic
> issues. I ranked them concerning implementatbility and usefulness (if
> applies) and sorted them between OOo2.0 relevant and OOoBib (later)
> relevant. Also I commented on the task issues I found.
>
> I would like you to review the attached document and give feedback. This is
> only a "working document", so I did not make much fuss about formatting and
> such. If you know any other open bibliography-related issues that I have
> not included or if you have issues that are not yet reported but could be
> fixed relatively easy, let me know!
>
> AFTER your review and comments are integrated I would like to put the
> document in our documents secion.
>
> I hope this might one day help the "poor" OOo2.0 users. ;-)
>
> Matthias Basler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This mail was sent through http://webmail.uni-jena.de
--
-------------------
David N. Wilson
Co-Project Lead for the Bibliographic
OpenOffice Project
http://bibliographic.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
