Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > > I think > > there are two possibilities for handling this and I am not sure which > > route > > you have chosen to follow: > > 1. Use the organisation (or an abbreviation) as the creator name and > > sort as > > normal. > > That's how it works. > > > 2. Leave the creator name blank in which case the sort algorithm will > > have > > to recognise the material type and if necessary use the organisation > > as the > > primary sort key (and of course for display in the citation). > > I think you're "preferable" option is more complicated than it needs to > be. > > One of the ways I decoupled name handling from reference type details > is to use the generic creator and to separately handle role (author, > editor, etc.). It simplifies things a fair bit, while making them more > flexible too.
OK, great. So that means that within the database if the creator is a person it (he/she!) would appear in an author (or editor) field, and if it was an organisation it would appear in, for example, an organisation field. Are you handling this during the insert citation process or expecting it to be handled within the database? Obviously this has an impact if the bibliography plug-in is to handle multiple database sources. Vince --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
